Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27100455›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

Predicting Inpatient Readmission and Outpatient Admission in Elderly: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Kun-Pei Lin, Pei-Chun Chen, Ling-Ya Huang, Hsiu-Chen Mao, Ding-Cheng Derrick Chan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Risk Factors for Early Hospital Readmission in Geriatric Patients: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Predicting the 14-Day Hospital Readmission of Patients with Pneumonia Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kun-Pei LinFrom the Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology (K-PL, H-CM, D-CC); Department of Internal Medicine (K-PL, D-CC), National Taiwan University Hospital; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (P-CC), College of Public Health, National Taiwan University; Clinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center (P-CC); Department of Neurology (P-CC), Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi Branch, Chiayi, Taiwan; Chang-Gung University; National Taiwan University Health Data Research Center (L-YH); and National Taiwan University Hospital Chu-Tung Branch (D-CC), Chu-Tung, Taiwan.
Pei-Chun Chen
Ling-Ya Huang
Hsiu-Chen Mao
Ding-Cheng Derrick Chan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing potentially avoidable hospital readmission and admissions are important health care quality issues. We develop prediction models for inpatient readmission and outpatient admission to hospitals for older adults In the retrospective cohort study with 2 million sampling file of the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, older adults (aged ≥65 y/o) with a first admission in 2008 were enrolled in the inpatient cohort (N = 39,156). The outpatient cohort included subjects who had ≥1 outpatient visit in 2008 (N = 178,286). Each cohort was split into derivation (3/4) and validation (1/4) data set. Primary outcome of the inpatient cohort: 30-day readmission from the date of discharge. The outpatient cohort included hospital admissions within the 1-year follow-up period. Candidate risk factors include demographics, comorbidities, and previous health care utilizations. Series of logistic regression models were applied with area under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) to identify the best model. Roughly 1 of 7 (14.6%) of the inpatients was readmitted within 30 days, and 1 of 5 (19.1%) of the outpatient cohort was admitted within 1 year. Age, education, use of home health care, and selected comorbidities (e.g., cancer with metastasis) were included in the final model. The AUC of the inpatient readmission model was 0.655 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.646-0.664) and outpatient admission model was 0.642 (95% CI 0.639-0.646). Predictive performance was maintained in both validation data sets. The goodness-to-fit model demonstrated good calibration in both groups. We developed and validated practical clinical prediction models for inpatient readmission and outpatient admissions for general older adults with indicators easily obtained from an administrative data set.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceQuality Assurance, Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeoplasmsOutpatientsPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID27100455
PMCPMC4845859

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.