Evidence mapPaperPMID 27101098Full record

SynthesisExpert opinion on investigational drugs2016

Clinical outcome of treatment with serine-threonine kinase inhibitors in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review of literature.

Marcia A Ciccone, Asaf Maoz, Jennifer K Casabar, Hiroko Machida, Seiji Mabuchi, Koji Matsuo

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rare ovarian tumours. Other treatments for ovarian cancer.EJC supplements : EJC : official journal of EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer ... [et al.] · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcia A Cicconea Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Asaf Maozb Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Jennifer K Casabara Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Hiroko Machidaa Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Seiji Mabuchic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine , Osaka , Japan.
Koji Matsuoa Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
University of Southern California · USOsaka University · JP

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · 1985 to 2025
$66.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile serine-threonine kinases (STK) are attractive therapeutic targets in epithelial ovarian cancer, clinical outcomes of STK inhibitors in the management of recurrent disease have not been completely described. AREAS COVERED: A systematic literature review of published clinical studies on STK inhibitors targeting mTOR, MAPK, and aurora kinase pathways in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer was conducted, revealing 18 clinical trials (497 patients). Pooled analyses were performed to assess treatment response, survival time, and adverse events. Median progression-free survival was 3.4 months in STK inhibitor-based therapy, and the average response rate and clinical benefit rate were 13% and 67%, respectively. Among regimens comprised of only STK inhibitors (11 trials, 299 patients), median progression-free time was 2.7 months, response rate was 10%, and clinical benefit rate was 64%. Compared to single STK inhibitor monotherapy (52.5%), clinical benefit rates significantly improved when STK inhibitors were combined with a cytotoxic agent (71.4%), other class biological agent (74.2%), or an additional STK inhibitor (95.0%) (all, P ≤ 0.002). EXPERT OPINION: STK inhibitor-based therapy showed modest activity for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with reasonable clinical benefit rates, suggesting its potential utility for maintaining disease stability if supported by future studies. Efficacy appears greatly improved in appropriately selected patient populations, especially those with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, platinum-sensitive disease, cancers with somatic RAS or BRAF mutations, and when used in a combination regimen with a cytotoxic or biological agent.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDisease-Free SurvivalDrug DesignFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPatient SelectionProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesAurora kinase inhibitorMAPK inhibitorMEK inhibitormetforminmTOR inhibitorovarian cancersorafenibSTK inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID27101098
PMCPMC7534810
OpenAlexW2338098903

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.