Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27102490›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nephrology2016

Epicardial adipose tissue volume increase in hemodialysis patients treated with sevelamer or calcium-based phosphate binders: a substudy of the Renagel in new dialysis trial.

Sung Min Ko, Chao Zhang, Zhengjia Chen, Luis D'Marco, Antonio Bellasi, Arthur E Stillman, Geoffrey Block, Paolo Raggi

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Novel imaging biomarkers: epicardial adipose tissue evaluation.The British journal of radiology · 2020 · on this map
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Renal Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sung Min KoDepartment of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 4-12 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-729, Korea.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zhengjia ChenDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Luis D'MarcoHospital Residència Sant Camil, Ronda Sant Camil, 08810, Sant Pere de Ribes, Catalunya, Spain.
Antonio BellasiSant' Anna Hospital, Como, Italy.
Arthur E StillmanDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Geoffrey BlockDenver Nephrology, Denver, CO, USA.
Paolo RaggiDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. raggi@ualberta.ca.
Emory University · USColorado Kidney Care · USEmory University Hospital · USKonkuk University Medical Center · KRUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the general population and in hemodialysis patients epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular events. Weight loss and lipid lowering therapies reduced EAT in the general population. It is unknown whether sevelamer, a phosphate (Pi) binder that lowers cholesterol and reduces inflammation in dialysis patients also affects EAT progression.

methodsPost-hoc analysis of a randomized trial of sevelamer (SVL) versus calcium-based Pi binders (CPiB) in incident hemodialysis patients. EAT was measured on cardiac computed tomography scans performed at enrollment, 6, 12 and 18 months from baseline.

resultsOf 109 patients, 54 received SVL and 55 CPiB; the median LDL change was -16.4 % (IQR: -67.5, 142.3 %) and 12.1 % (IQR: -51.9, 193.8 %) with SVL and CPiB respectively (p < 0.001). At baseline EAT correlated significantly with gender, body mass index and total coronary artery calcium score (all p < 0.02). At the end of follow-up, EAT progressed significantly from baseline in the CPiB treated patients but not in the SVL treated patients [median increase 9.1 % (p = 0.005) vs 3.9 % (p = 0.25)]. However, there was no significant difference in the degree of progression between treatment groups (p = 0.34). There was no correlation between LDL or CRP change and EAT change. There were insufficient events in either arm to assess the impact of EAT change on mortality.

conclusionEAT progression from baseline was significantly smaller with SVL than with CPiB, although the difference between treatments was not statistically significant, probably due to the small sample size. Change in serum lipids and markers of inflammation did not predict EAT progression.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAdipose TissueAdiposityAdultAgedBiomarkersCalcium CompoundsChelating AgentsFemaleHumansKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPericardiumPhosphatesSevelamerBiomarkersCalcium CompoundsChelating AgentsPhosphatesSevelamerEpicardial adipose tissueHemodialysisPhosphate binders

Identifiers

PMID27102490
OpenAlexW2336016926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.