Trial reportJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2016
The Effect of Cilostazol on Endothelial Function as Assessed by Flow-Mediated Dilation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Trial report in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cilostazol improves endothelial function in acute cerebral ischemia patients: a double-blind placebo controlled trial with flow-mediated dilation technique.BMC neurology · 2017Trial
- Cell-free plasma telomere length correlated with the risk of cardiovascular events using machine learning classifiers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Studies Applying Flow-Mediated Dilation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Alpha-2-macroglobulin as a Promising Biological Marker of Endothelial Function.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2018Article
- Flow Mediated Dilatation as a Biomarker in Vascular Surgery Research.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2017Review
- The Combination Therapy of Fenofibrate and Ezetimibe Improved Lipid Profile and Vascular Function Compared with Statins in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2017Article
- Antiplatelet Drugs and Endothelial Function.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe vascular endothelium plays a key role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a novel way of assessing endothelial function. Cilostazol is a unique antiplatelet drug that also has the potential to improve endothelial function. The objective of this present study was to investigate the effects of cilosatzol on endothelial function as assessed by FMD.
methodsFifty-one patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) were assigned to one of two groups: the Cilostazol(+) group (with cilostazol) and Cilostazol(-) group (without cilostazol). In addition to conventional dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel/ticlopidine, the Cilostazol(+) group (n=27) was also given cilostazol (100 mg/day). The Cilostazol(-) group (n=24) did not receive cilostazol. FMD was assessed at enrollment and after 6-9 months.
resultsThe FMD of both the Cilostazol(+) and Cilostazol(-) groups remained similar at 5.2 (interquartile range: 3.8-8.5) to 5.4 (interquartile range: 4.2-6.7) (P=0.29) and 5.0 (interquartile range: 3.6-6.4) to 4.9 (interquartile range: 4.0-7.0) (P=0.38), respectively. However, the diameters of the baseline and maximal brachial arteries tended to increase in the Cilostazol(+) group (baseline: 4.2±0.7 to 4.4±0.7, P=0.18; maximal: 4.5±0.7 to 4.6±0.7 P=0.22), whereas that of the Cilostazol(-) group tended to decrease (baseline: 4.1±0.6 to 3.9±0.5, P=0.10; maximal: 4.3±0.7 to 4.1±0.5, P=0.05). The rates of change in the baseline diameter (Cilostazol(+): 3.7±9.8% vs. Cilostazol(-): -3.8±12.2%, P=0.03) and maximal diameter (Cilostazol(+): +3.1±8.9% vs. Cilostazol(-): -4.4±12.0%, P=0.02) were significantly different.
conclusionAlthough cilostazol didn't affect the FMD, there was a significant difference in the rates of change in baseline and maximal brachial artery diameter. This may have a beneficial effect in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.