ReviewHormones & cancer2016
Patient-Derived Prostate Cancer: from Basic Science to the Clinic.
Review in Hormones & cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new tumorgraft panel to accelerate precision medicine in prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Recapitulation of prostate tissue cell type-specific transcriptomes by an in vivo primary prostate tissue xenograft model.PloS one · 2020Article
- Development of patient-derived xenograft models of prostate cancer for maintaining tumor heterogeneity.Translational andrology and urology · 2019Review
- Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Preclinical Models of Prostate Cancer: Patient-Derived Xenografts, Organoids, and Other Explant Models.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systems that model cancer form the backbone of research discovery, and their accuracy and validity are a key determinant to ensure successful translation. In many tumour types, patient-derived specimens are an important model of choice for pre-clinical drug development. In this review, we consider why this has been such a challenge for prostate cancer, resulting in relatively few patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of prostatic tumours compared to breast cancers, for example. Nevertheless, with only a few patient specimens and PDXs, we exemplify in three vignettes how important new clinical insights were obtained resulting in benefit for future men with prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.