Evidence mapPaperPMID 27199121Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2016

Differential effects of nebivolol vs. metoprolol on microvascular function in hypertensive humans.

Alejandro Velasco, Elizabeth Solow, Angela Price, Zhongyun Wang, Debbie Arbique, Gary Arbique, Beverley Adams-Huet, Edzard Schwedhelm, Jonathan R Lindner, Wanpen Vongpatanasin

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alejandro VelascoHypertension Section, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;
Elizabeth SolowRheumatology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;
Angela PriceHypertension Section, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;
Zhongyun WangHypertension Section, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;
Debbie ArbiqueHypertension Section, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;
Gary ArbiqueDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;
Beverley Adams-HuetDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;
Edzard SchwedhelmDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and.
Jonathan R LindnerKnight Cardiovascular Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Wanpen VongpatanasinHypertension Section, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Rheumatology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; wanpen.vongpatanasin@utsouthwestern.edu.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

Neural Mechanism of Thiazide-Induced Insulin ResistanceR01HL078782 · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · 2005 to 2005
$414k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024982NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL078782NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of β-adrenergic receptor (AR) blocker is associated with increased risk of fatigue and exercise intolerance. Nebivolol is a newer generation β-blocker, which is thought to avoid this side effect via its vasodilating property. However, the effects of nebivolol on skeletal muscle perfusion during exercise have not been determined in hypertensive patients. Accordingly, we performed contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion imaging of the forearm muscles in 25 untreated stage I hypertensive patients at rest and during handgrip exercise at baseline or after 12 wk of treatment with nebivolol (5-20 mg/day) or metoprolol succinate (100-300 mg/day), with a subsequent double crossover for 12 wk. Metoprolol and nebivolol each induced a reduction in the resting blood pressure and heart rate (130.9 ± 2.6/81.7 ± 1.8 vs. 131.6 ± 2.7/80.8 ± 1.5 mmHg and 63 ± 2 vs. 64 ± 2 beats/min) compared with baseline (142.1 ± 2.0/88.7 ± 1.4 mmHg and 75 ± 2 beats/min, respectively, both P < 0.01). Metoprolol significantly attenuated the increase in microvascular blood volume (MBV) during handgrip at 12 and 20 repetitions/min by 50% compared with baseline (mixed-model P < 0.05), which was not observed with nebivolol. Neither metoprolol nor nebivolol affected microvascular flow velocity (MFV). Similarly, metoprolol and nebivolol had no effect on the increase in the conduit brachial artery flow as determined by duplex Doppler ultrasound. Thus our study demonstrated a first direct evidence for metoprolol-induced impairment in the recruitment of microvascular units during exercise in hypertensive humans, which was avoided by nebivolol. This selective reduction in MBV without alteration in MFV by metoprolol suggested impaired vasodilation at the precapillary arteriolar level.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsCross-Over StudiesEndothelial CellsFemaleForearmHand StrengthHumansHypertensionMaleMetoprololMicrocirculationMicrovesselsMiddle AgedMuscle ContractionMuscle FatigueAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsMetoprololNADPH OxidasesNebivololneutrophil cytosolic factor 1Vasodilator Agentsexercisehypertensionmuscle blood flowsympathetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID27199121
PMCPMC4967201
OpenAlexW2385482476

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.