Evidence mapPaperPMID 27200367Full record

ArticleNuclear receptor research2015

Pan-cancer analyses of the nuclear receptor superfamily.

Mark D Long, Moray J Campbell

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear receptor research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark D LongDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Moray J CampbellDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and ImmunotherapyP30CA016056 · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · 1985 to 2025
$19.4M
Vitamin D Analogs for Chemoprevention of Prostate CancerR01CA095367 · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · 2002 to 2005
$1.6M
Vitamin D in Prostate Cancer: Tumor Vasculature EffectsR01CA095045 · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · 2002 to 2005
$1.5M
DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND CANCER TREATMENTST32CA009072 · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · 1985 to 2005
$981k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095045NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095367NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear receptors (NR) act as an integrated conduit for environmental and hormonal signals to govern genomic responses, which relate to cell fate decisions. We review how their integrated actions with each other, shared co-factors and other transcription factors are disrupted in cancer. Steroid hormone nuclear receptors are oncogenic drivers in breast and prostate cancer and blockade of signaling is a major therapeutic goal. By contrast to blockade of receptors, in other cancers enhanced receptor function is attractive, as illustrated initially with targeting of retinoic acid receptors in leukemia. In the post-genomic era large consortia, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas, have developed a remarkable volume of genomic data with which to examine multiple aspects of nuclear receptor status in a pan-cancer manner. Therefore to extend the review of NR function we have also undertaken bioinformatics analyses of NR expression in over 3000 tumors, spread across six different tumor types (bladder, breast, colon, head and neck, liver and prostate). Specifically, to ask how the NR expression was distorted (altered expression, mutation and CNV) we have applied bootstrapping approaches to simulate data for comparison, and also compared these NR findings to 12 other transcription factor families. Nuclear receptors were uniquely and uniformly downregulated across all six tumor types, more than predicted by chance. These approaches also revealed that each tumor type had a specific NR expression profile but these were most similar between breast and prostate cancer. Some NRs were down-regulated in at least five tumor types (e.g.

Indexed as

Bootstrap analysescancer NR3C1/GR NR5A2/LRH-1 NR1B3/RARGcopy number variationgene expressionmutationTCGA

Identifiers

PMID27200367
PMCPMC4869537
OpenAlexW2289408112

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.