ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2016
A Pilot Study of Quantitative MRI Parametric Response Mapping of Bone Marrow Fat for Treatment Assessment in Myelofibrosis.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- The value of bone marrow, liver, and spleen imaging in diagnosis, prognostication, and follow-up monitoring of myeloproliferative neoplasms: a systematic review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2021Pooled it
- Quantitative MRI Assessment of Bone Marrow Disease in Myelofibrosis: A Prospective Study.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Observational
- Fat Fraction MRI for Longitudinal Assessment of Bone Marrow Heterogeneity in a Mouse Model of Myelofibrosis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- A deep learning aided bone marrow segmentation of quantitative fat MRI for myelofibrosis patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Quantitative MRI reveals heterogeneous impacts of treatment on diseased bone marrow in a mouse model of myelofibrosis.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Improved Repeatability of Mouse Tibia Volume Segmentation in Murine Myelofibrosis Model Using Deep Learning.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Repeatability of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers in the Tibia Bone Marrow of a Murine Myelofibrosis Model.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Multiparametric MRI to quantify disease and treatment response in mice with myeloproliferative neoplasms.JCI insight · 2022Article
- Parametric Response Mapping of FLAIR MRI Provides an Early Indication of Progression Risk in Glioblastoma.Academic radiology · 2021Article
- Proximal femur fat fraction variation in healthy subjects using chemical shift-encoding based MRI.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Primary myelofibrosis evolving to an aplastic appearing marrow.Clinical case reports · 2018Article
- Demonstration of an Inline Publication Image Viewer: The Future of Radiological Publishing.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Myelofibrosis (MF) is a hematologic neoplasm arising as a primary disease or secondary to other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Both primary and secondary MF are uniquely associated with progressive bone marrow fibrosis, displacing normal hematopoietic cells from the marrow space and disrupting normal production of mature blood cells. Activation of the JAK2 signaling pathway in hematopoietic stem cells commonly causes MF, and ruxolitinib, a drug targeting this pathway, is the treatment of choice for many patients. However, current measures of disease status in MF do not necessarily predict response to treatment with ruxolitinib or other drugs in MF. Bone marrow biopsies are invasive and prone to sampling error, while measurements of spleen volume only indirectly reflect bone marrow status. Toward the goal of developing an imaging biomarker for treatment response in MF, we present preliminary results from a prospective clinical study evaluating parametric response mapping (PRM) of quantitative Dixon MRI bone marrow fat fraction maps in four MF patients treated with ruxolitinib. PRM allows for the voxel-wise identification of significant change in quantitative imaging readouts over time, in this case the bone marrow fat content. We identified heterogeneous response patterns of bone marrow fat among patients and within different bone marrow sites in the same patient. We also observed discordance between changes in bone marrow fat fraction and reductions in spleen volume, the standard imaging metric for treatment efficacy. This study provides initial support for PRM analysis of quantitative MRI of bone marrow fat to monitor response to therapy in MF, setting the stage for larger studies to further develop and validate this method as a complementary imaging biomarker for this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.