Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27274821›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2016

Therapeutic variability in adult minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

Gema Fernandez-Juarez, Javier Villacorta, Gloria Ruiz-Roso, Nayara Panizo, Isabel Martinez-Marín, Helena Marco, Pilar Arrizabalaga, Montserrat Díaz, Vanessa Perez-Gómez, Marco Vaca and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Gema Fernandez-JuarezDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón , calle Budapest 1, Alcorcón, Madrid , Spain.
Javier VillacortaDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón , calle Budapest 1, Alcorcón, Madrid , Spain.
Gloria Ruiz-RosoDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital Ramón y Cajal , Madrid , Spain.
Nayara PanizoDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon , C/Doctor Esquerdo 46, Madrid , Spain.
Isabel Martinez-MarínDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón , calle Budapest 1, Alcorcón, Madrid , Spain.
Helena MarcoDepartment of Dialysis , Fundacio Puigvert , Barcelona , Spain.
Pilar ArrizabalagaDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital Clinico , c/Villarroel 170, Barcelona , Spain.
Montserrat DíazDepartment of Nephrology , Fundació Puigvert , Barcelona , Spain.
Vanessa Perez-GómezDepartment of Nephrology , Fundacion Jimenez Días , Madrid , Spain.
Marco VacaDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital Universitario La Paz , Madrid , Spain.
Eva RodríguezDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital del Mar , Barcelona , Spain.
Carmen CobeloDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital Lucus Augusti Ulises Romero , Lugo , Spain.
Loreto FernandezDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias , Alcala de Henares, Madrid , Spain.
Ana AvilaDepartment of Nephrology , Dr Peset Hospital , Avda Gaspar Aguilar, 90, 46027 Valencia , Spain.
Manuel PragaDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital 12 de Octubre , Carretera de Andalucia, km 5,400, Madrid , Spain.
Carlos QueredaDepartment of Nephrology , Hospital Ramón y Cajal , Madrid , Spain.
Alberto OrtizFundacion Jimenez Diaz , Universidad Autonoma, Unidad de Dialisis , Av. Reyes Catolicos 2, Madrid , Spain.
Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESPuigvert Foundation · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti · ESHospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVariability in the management of glomerulonephritis may negatively impact efficacy and safety. However, there are little/no data on actual variability in the treatment of minimal change disease (MCD)/focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in adults. We assessed Spanish practice patterns for the management of adult nephrotic syndrome due to MCD or FSGS. The absence of reasonably good evidence on treatment for a disease often increases the variability substantially. Identification of evidence-practice gaps is the first necessary step in the knowledge-to-action cyclical process. We aim to analyse the real clinical practice in adults in hospitals in Spain and compare this with the recently released Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis.

methodsParticipating centres were required to include all adult patients (age >18 years) with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of MCD or FSGS from 2007 to 2011. Exclusion criteria included the diagnosis of secondary nephropathy.

resultsWe studied 119 Caucasian patients with biopsy-proven MCD (n = 71) or FSGS (n = 48) from 13 Spanish hospitals. Of these patients, 102 received immunosuppressive treatment and 17 conservative treatment. The initial treatment was steroids, except in one patient in which mycophenolate mofetil was used. In all patients, the steroids were given as a single daily dose. The mean duration of steroid treatment at initial high doses was 8.7 ± 13.2 weeks and the mean global duration was 38 ± 32 weeks. The duration of initial high-dose steroids was <4 weeks in 41% of patients and >16 weeks in 10.5% of patients. We did find a weak and negative correlation between the duration of whole steroid treatment in the first episode and the number of the later relapses (r = -0.24, P = 0.023). There were 98 relapses and they were more frequent in MCD than in FSGs patients (2.10 ± 1.6 versus 1.56 ± 1.2; P = 0.09). The chosen treatment was mainly steroids (95%). Only seven relapses were treated with another drug as a first-line treatment: two relapses were treated with mycophenolate and five relapses were treated with anticalcineurinics. A second-line treatment was needed in 29 patients (24.4%), and the most frequent drugs were the calcineurin inhibitors (55%), followed by mycophenolate mofetil (31%). Although cyclophosphamide is the recommended treatment, it was used in only 14% of the patients.

conclusionsWe found variation from the guidelines in the duration of initial and tapered steroid therapy, in the medical criteria for classifying a steroid-resistant condition and in the chosen treatment for the second-line treatment. All nephrologists started with a daily dose of steroids as the first-line treatment. The most frequently used steroid-sparing drug was calcineurin inhibitors. Cyclophosphamide use was much lower than expected.

Indexed as

clinical practice variabilityglomerulonephritisimmunosuppression

Identifiers

PMID27274821
PMCPMC4886920
OpenAlexW2401252351

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.