Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27286959›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Anchoring genome sequence to chromosomes of the central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) enables reconstruction of ancestral squamate macrochromosomes and identifies sequence content of the Z chromosome.

Janine E Deakin, Melanie J Edwards, Hardip Patel, Denis O'Meally, Jinmin Lian, Rachael Stenhouse, Sam Ryan, Alexandra M Livernois, Bhumika Azad, Clare E Holleley and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex Chromosome Turnovers and Stability in Snakes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Comparative Cytogenetics of the Malagasy Ground Geckos of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sex-specific splicing of Z- and W-borneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Janine E DeakinInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Janine.Deakin@canberra.edu.au.
Melanie J EdwardsInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Hardip PatelJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Denis O'MeallyInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Jinmin LianChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Rachael StenhouseInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Sam RyanInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Alexandra M LivernoisInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Bhumika AzadInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Clare E HolleleyInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Qiye LiChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Arthur GeorgesInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
University of Canberra · AUAustralian National University · AUChina National GeneBank · CNNatural History Museum Aarhus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSquamates (lizards and snakes) are a speciose lineage of reptiles displaying considerable karyotypic diversity, particularly among lizards. Understanding the evolution of this diversity requires comparison of genome organisation between species. Although the genomes of several squamate species have now been sequenced, only the green anole lizard has any sequence anchored to chromosomes. There is only limited gene mapping data available for five other squamates. This makes it difficult to reconstruct the events that have led to extant squamate karyotypic diversity. The purpose of this study was to anchor the recently sequenced central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) genome to chromosomes to trace the evolution of squamate chromosomes. Assigning sequence to sex chromosomes was of particular interest for identifying candidate sex determining genes.

resultsBy using two different approaches to map conserved blocks of genes, we were able to anchor approximately 42 % of the dragon genome sequence to chromosomes. We constructed detailed comparative maps between dragon, anole and chicken genomes, and where possible, made broader comparisons across Squamata using cytogenetic mapping information for five other species. We show that squamate macrochromosomes are relatively well conserved between species, supporting findings from previous molecular cytogenetic studies. Macrochromosome diversity between members of the Toxicofera clade has been generated by intrachromosomal, and a small number of interchromosomal, rearrangements. We reconstructed the ancestral squamate macrochromosomes by drawing upon comparative cytogenetic mapping data from seven squamate species and propose the events leading to the arrangements observed in representative species. In addition, we assigned over 8 Mbp of sequence containing 219 genes to the Z chromosome, providing a list of genes to begin testing as candidate sex determining genes.

conclusionsAnchoring of the dragon genome has provided substantial insight into the evolution of squamate genomes, enabling us to reconstruct ancestral macrochromosome arrangements at key positions in the squamate phylogeny, demonstrating that fusions between macrochromosomes or fusions of macrochromosomes and microchromosomes, have played an important role during the evolution of squamate genomes. Assigning sequence to the sex chromosomes has identified NR5A1 as a promising candidate sex determining gene in the dragon.

Indexed as

ChromosomesEvolution, MolecularGenomeGenomicsAnimalsChickensChromosome MappingFemaleIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypeLizardsMaleSex ChromosomesSex Determination ProcessesAncestral karyotypeCytogenetic mapGenome evolutionMacrochromosomeMicrochromosomeReptileSex chromosomeSex determination

Identifiers

PMID27286959
PMCPMC4902969
OpenAlexW2411551763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.