Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27296249›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Evaluation of a video-based Internet intervention as preparation for inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Jan Becker, Manfred E Beutel, Katharina Gerzymisch, Dirk Schulz, Martin Siepmann, Rudolf J Knickenberg, Stefan Schmädeke, Peter Ferdinand, Rüdiger Zwerenz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02532881 (Evaluation of a Video-based Internet Intervention as Preparation for Inpatient Psychosomatic Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02532881 phase2completednot on this map

Evaluation of a Video-based Internet Intervention as Preparation for Inpatient Psychosomatic Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohannes Gutenberg University MainzRan2015 to 2016Enrolled492ConditionsOutcome ExpectancyArmsVideos, Treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan BeckerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany. jan.becker@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Manfred E BeutelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Katharina GerzymischDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Dirk SchulzMedia Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Wallstraße 11, 55122, Mainz, Germany.
Martin SiepmannPsychosomatic Clinic, RHÖN-KLINIKUM Campus Bad Neustadt, Kurhausstraße 31, 97616, Bad Neustadt/Saale, Germany.
Rudolf J KnickenbergPsychosomatic Clinic, RHÖN-KLINIKUM Campus Bad Neustadt, Kurhausstraße 31, 97616, Bad Neustadt/Saale, Germany.
Stefan SchmädekeAHG Clinic for Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Bad Dürkheim, Kurbrunnenstraße 12, 67098, Bad Dürkheim, Germany.
Peter FerdinandKnowledge Media Institute of the University of Koblenz-Landau, Universitätsstraße 1, 56070, Coblenz, Germany.
Rüdiger ZwerenzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients' treatment expectations are a key factor in psychotherapy. Several studies have linked higher expectations to better treatment success. Therefore, we want to evaluate the impact of a targeted video-based intervention on patients' expectations and the treatment success of inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS/

designAll patients who will be referred to inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation in three clinics will receive a study flyer with information about how to log in to the study platform together with the usual clinic information leaflet. Patients will receive the study information and informed consent upon login and will be randomized into the intervention or the control group. The intervention group (n = 394) will get access to our virtual online clinic, containing several videos about inpatient rehabilitation, until their admission to inpatient rehabilitation. The control group (n = 394) will receive no special treatment preparation. Questionnaires will be given at study inclusion (T0), two weeks before admission to (T1), and at the end of (T2) inpatient rehabilitation. The primary outcome is the outcome expectancy measured with the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire at T1. Secondary outcomes include treatment motivation, mental health, work ability, depression, anxiety, and satisfaction with and usage of the Internet platform. DISCUSSION: We expect the intervention group to benefit from the additional preparation concerning their outcome expectancy. If successful, this approach could be used in the future to enhance the efficacy of inpatient rehabilitation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02532881 . Registered on 25 August 2015.

Indexed as

InpatientsInternetPatient AdmissionTherapy, Computer-AssistedVideo RecordingClinical ProtocolsGermanyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMental DisordersPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPsychiatric RehabilitationResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsInpatient psychosomatic rehabilitationInternet interventionOnline preparationOutcome expectancyRandomized controlled trialTreatment expectation

Identifiers

PMID27296249
PMCPMC4906995

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.