Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27308406›Full record

ReviewMolecular & cellular oncology

To live or let die - complexity within the E2F1 pathway.

A Poppy Roworth, Fatemeh Ghari, Nicholas B La Thangue

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular & cellular oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Functional Role and Regulatory Mechanism of FTO mInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023
    Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Poppy RoworthLaboratory of Cancer Biology; Department of Oncology; University of Oxford ; Oxford, UK.
Fatemeh GhariLaboratory of Cancer Biology; Department of Oncology; University of Oxford ; Oxford, UK.
Nicholas B La ThangueLaboratory of Cancer Biology; Department of Oncology; University of Oxford ; Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13058Medical Research Council G0500905Medical Research Council G1000807Medical Research Council G9400953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The E2F1 transcription factor is a recognized regulator of the cell cycle as well as a potent mediator of DNA damage-induced apoptosis and the checkpoint response. Understanding the diverse and seemingly dichotomous functions of E2F1 activity has been the focus of extensive ongoing research. Although the E2F pathway is frequently deregulated in cancer, the contributions of E2F1 itself to tumorigenesis, as a promoter of proliferation or cell death, are far from understood. In this review we aim to provide an update on our current understanding of E2F1, with particular insight into its novel interaction partners and post-translational modifications, as a means to explaining its diverse functional complexity.

Indexed as

apoptosiscancercell cycleDNA damage responseE2F1epigenetics

Identifiers

PMID27308406
PMCPMC4905241
OpenAlexW2085896082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.