ArticleMedicine2016
Impact of Age on the Prognosis of Operable Gastric Cancer Patients: An Analysis Based on SEER Database.
Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of maintenance therapy with fluoropyrimidines in advanced esophageal-gastric adenocarcinoma: a critical review.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- XGBoost-based model for predicting five-year survival in gastric cancer using clinical indicators.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Is D2 laparoscopic gastrectomy essential for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer? A propensity score matched analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Risk Score Prediction Model of Prognosis in GC Patients by Age and Gender Combined With m6A Modification Genes FTO and RBM15.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Prognosis factors of advanced gastric cancer according to sex and age.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- A nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in different age groups for operable gastric cancer: a population-based study.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy.Cancer management and research · 2018Article
- Age-specific impact on the survival of gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis: an analysis of SEER database.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Erratum: Medicine, Volume 95, Issue 24: Erratum.Medicine · 2016Article
- Erratum: Impact of Age on the Prognosis of Operable Gastric Cancer Patients: An Analysis Based on SEER Database: Erratum.Medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the impact of age on the clinicopathological features and survival of patients with gastric cancer (GC), and hope to better define age-specific patterns of GC and possible associated risk factors.Using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database to search the patients who diagnosed GC between 2007 and 2011 with a known age. The overall and 5-year gastric cancer specific survival (CSS) data were obtained using Kaplan-Meier plots. Multivariable Cox regression models were built for the analysis of long-term survival outcomes and risk factors.A total of 7762 GC patients treated with surgery during the 4-year study period were included in the final study cohort. We divided into five subgroups according to the different age ranges. The overall 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) was 60.3% in Group 1 (below 45 years), 60.3% in the Group 2 (45-55 years), 61.2% in Group 3 (56-65 years), 59.2% in Group 4 (66-75 years), and 59.2% in Group 5 (older than 76 years). Kaplan-Meier plots showed that patients older than 76 years had the worst 5-year CSS of 56.0% rate in all the subgroups. Age, tumor size, primary site, histological type, and Tumor Node Metastasis stage were identified as significant risk factors for poor survival on univariate analysis (all P < 0.001, log-rank test). Additionally, as the age increased, the risk of death for GC demonstrated a significant increase.In conclusion, our analysis of the SEER database revealed that the prognosis of GC varies with age. Patients at age 56 to 65 group have more favorable clinicopathologic characteristics and better CSS than other groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.