Evidence mapPaperPMID 27353261Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016

Discontinuation and restarting in patients on statin treatment: prospective open cohort study using a primary care database.

Yana Vinogradova, Carol Coupland, Peter Brindle, Julia Hippisley-Cox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2022 · on this map
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Medication Discontinuation in the IMPROVE-IT Trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2019
    Trial
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Management of patients with statin intolerance.Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yana VinogradovaDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG2 7RD, UK Yana.Vinogradova@nottingham.ac.uk.
Carol CouplandDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG2 7RD, UK.
Peter BrindleAvon Primary Care Research Collaborative, Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group, Bristol, UK University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Julia Hippisley-CoxDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG2 7RD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate rates of discontinuation and restarting of statins, and to identify patient characteristics associated with either discontinuation or restarting.

designProspective open cohort study.

setting664 general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in the United Kingdom. Data extracted in October 2014.

participantsIncident statin users aged 25-84 years identified between January 2002 and September 2013. Patients with statin prescriptions divided into two groups: primary prevention and secondary prevention (those already diagnosed with cardiovascular disease). Patients with statin prescriptions in the 12 months before study entry were excluded.

main outcome measuresDiscontinuation of statin treatment (first 90 day gap after the estimated end date of a statin prescription), and restarting statin treatment for those who discontinued (defined as any subsequent prescription between discontinuation and study end).

resultsOf 431 023 patients prescribed statins as primary prevention with a median follow-up time of 137 weeks, 47% (n=204 622) discontinued treatment and 72% (n=147 305) of those who discontinued restarted. Of 139 314 patients prescribed statins as secondary prevention with median follow-up time of 182 weeks, 41% (n=57 791) discontinued treatment and 75% (43 211) of those who discontinued restarted. Younger patients (aged ≤50 years), older patients (≥75 years), women, and patients with chronic liver disease were more likely to discontinue statins and less likely to restart. However, patients in ethnic minority groups, current smokers, and patients with type 1 diabetes were more likely to discontinue treatment but then were more likely to restart, whereas patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes were less likely to discontinue treatment and more likely to restart if they did discontinue. These results were mainly consistent in the primary prevention and secondary prevention groups.

conclusionsAlthough a large proportion of statin users discontinue, many of them restart. For many patient groups previously considered as "stoppers," the problem of statin treatment "stopping" could be part of the wider issue of poor adherence. Identification of patient groups associated with completely stopping or stop-starting behaviour has positive implications for patients and doctors as well as suggesting areas for future research.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDrug MonitoringPrimary PreventionSecondary PreventionAgedCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMedication Therapy ManagementMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareProspective StudiesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27353261
PMCPMC4925919

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.