Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27377652›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2016

The Cell Ontology 2016: enhanced content, modularization, and ontology interoperability.

Alexander D Diehl, Terrence F Meehan, Yvonne M Bradford, Matthew H Brush, Wasila M Dahdul, David S Dougall, Yongqun He, David Osumi-Sutherland, Alan Ruttenberg, Sirarat Sarntivijai and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 210 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
210citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

210 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Common Fund Data Ecosystem (CFDE).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alexander D DiehlDepartment of Neurology, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. addiehl@buffalo.edu.
Terrence F MeehanEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Yvonne M BradfordZFIN, the Zebrafish Model Organism Database, 5291 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Matthew H BrushOntology Development Group, Library, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, 97239, USA.
Wasila M DahdulDepartment of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.
David S DougallSouthwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Yongqun HeUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
David Osumi-SutherlandEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Alan RuttenbergOral Diagnostics Sciences, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, NY, 14210, USA.
Sirarat SarntivijaiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Ceri E Van SlykeZFIN, the Zebrafish Model Organism Database, 5291 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Nicole A VasilevskyOntology Development Group, Library, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, 97239, USA.
Melissa A HaendelOntology Development Group, Library, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, 97239, USA.
Judith A BlakeThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.
Christopher J MungallGenomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Paul Robson · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Resource ProjectU41HG002273 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMAS, PAUL D. · 2012 to 2021
$34.7M
ZFIN: The Zebrafish Model Organism DatabaseU41HG002659 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI WESTERFIELD, MONTE · 2011 to 2020
$30.7M
Gene Ontology ConsortiumP41HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
ZFIN:THE ZEBRAFISH MODEL ORGANISM DATABASEP41HG002659 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI WESTERFIELD, MONTE · 2003 to 2010
$21.2M
The Monarch Initiative: Linking Diseases to Model Organism ResourcesR24OD011883 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAENDEL, MELISSA A, MUNGALL, CHRISTOPHER J · 2012 to 2024
$16.0M
ZFIN: The Zebrafish Model Organism DatabaseU24HG002659 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI WESTERFIELD, MONTE · 2021 to 2025
$10.8M
PRO: A Protein Ontology in Open Biomedical OntologiesR01GM080646 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI WU, CATHY H. · 2007 to 2018
$8.9M
GENE ONTOLOGY CONSORTIUMR01HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2001 to 2003
$5.8M
Ontology-based Information Network to Support Vaccine ResearchR01AI081062 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HE, YONGQUN · 2009 to 2012
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002659NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG002659NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG002659NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201200028CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081062NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080646NIH HHS R24 OD011883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cell Ontology (CL) is an OBO Foundry candidate ontology covering the domain of canonical, natural biological cell types. Since its inception in 2005, the CL has undergone multiple rounds of revision and expansion, most notably in its representation of hematopoietic cells. For in vivo cells, the CL focuses on vertebrates but provides general classes that can be used for other metazoans, which can be subtyped in species-specific ontologies. CONSTRUCTION AND CONTENT: Recent work on the CL has focused on extending the representation of various cell types, and developing new modules in the CL itself, and in related ontologies in coordination with the CL. For example, the Kidney and Urinary Pathway Ontology was used as a template to populate the CL with additional cell types. In addition, subtypes of the class 'cell in vitro' have received improved definitions and labels to provide for modularity with the representation of cells in the Cell Line Ontology and Reagent Ontology. Recent changes in the ontology development methodology for CL include a switch from OBO to OWL for the primary encoding of the ontology, and an increasing reliance on logical definitions for improved reasoning. UTILITY AND DISCUSSION: The CL is now mandated as a metadata standard for large functional genomics and transcriptomics projects, and is used extensively for annotation, querying, and analyses of cell type specific data in sequencing consortia such as FANTOM5 and ENCODE, as well as for the NIAID ImmPort database and the Cell Image Library. The CL is also a vital component used in the modular construction of other biomedical ontologies-for example, the Gene Ontology and the cross-species anatomy ontology, Uberon, use CL to support the consistent representation of cell types across different levels of anatomical granularity, such as tissues and organs.

conclusionsThe ongoing improvements to the CL make it a valuable resource to both the OBO Foundry community and the wider scientific community, and we continue to experience increased interest in the CL both among developers and within the user community.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesCellsNatural Language ProcessingNervous System

Identifiers

PMID27377652
PMCPMC4932724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.