ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2017
Sonographic evaluation of tongue motions during upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea-a pilot study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hypoglossal nerve stimulation long-term clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2020Pooled it
- Selective upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: a single center clinical experience.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017Trial
- Ultrasonographic Tongue Base Motion Does Not Correlate With Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Outcomes.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Article
- The Application of Ultrasound to Quantify Hyoid Motion During Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy.The Laryngoscope · 2023Article
- Changes in tongue morphology predict responses in pharyngeal patency to selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023Article
- The Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation as a Novel Therapy for Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea-A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Ultrasound assessment of upper airway dilator muscle contraction during transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- Bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation for treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnoea.The European respiratory journal · 2020Article
- Article
- Review
- Patient experience with upper airway stimulation in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe objective was to evaluate the feasibility of sonographic evaluation of functional tongue motion as a tool to evaluate postoperative outcomes in human subjects using breathing-synchronized stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve-a novel therapy option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MATERIAL AND
methodsSixteen patients with OSA (n = 16, age 60.4 ± 10.2, BMI 28.7 ± 2.4, AHI 35.0 ± 11.8) underwent sonographic evaluation of tongue motion after initiation of therapy with the Inspire II Upper Airway Stimulation system. Sonographic examination was performed in four different planes (A = floor of the mouth frontal, B = base of the tongue horizontal, C = floor of the mouth parallel to mandible, and D = floor of the mouth median sagittal) in an attempt to visualize tongue surface, tongue and hyoid motion, and the distance of protrusion.
resultsIdentification of the tongue surface was achieved in all cases in planes B, C, and D and 81 % of patients in plane A. Tongue motion was evident on the right (implant) side in 63 % in plane A and 75 % in plane B. Distance of protrusion was measured in plane B at 1.04 cm (±0.51), in plane C at 1.08 cm (±0.47), and in plane D at 0.96 cm (±0.45). Hyoid protrusion was measured in plane C or D and was 0.57 cm (±0.39). Significant correlations among the three planes were observed, but there was no correlation to the reduction of apnea-hypopnea index.
conclusionThe results indicate feasibility of sonography to identify tongue and hyoid motions during upper airway stimulation. Useful sonographic planes and landmarks, which allow visualization of dynamic effects of upper airway stimulation, could be established. The evaluation of the tongue in a horizontal (B) and in a sagittal plane (D) appears to be superior to the other investigated planes. The approximate tongue protrusion needed to generate a significant reduction of AHI and ODI was 1 cm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27411337What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.