Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27466332›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Catecholaminergic Neuromodulation Shapes Intrinsic MRI Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain.

Ruud L van den Brink, Thomas Pfeffer, Christopher M Warren, Peter R Murphy, Klodiana-Daphne Tona, Nic J A van der Wee, Eric Giltay, Martijn S van Noorden, Serge A R B Rombouts, Tobias H Donner and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dynamic Network Connectivity: from monkeys to humans.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spectral Fingerprints of Cortical Neuromodulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Fluid intelligence and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruud L van den BrinkInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands, r.l.van.den.brink@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3142-7248
Thomas PfefferDepartment of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9561-3085
Christopher M WarrenInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2541-7246
Peter R MurphyInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1963-185X
Klodiana-Daphne TonaInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nic J A van der WeeLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Department of Psychiatry and.
Eric GiltayDepartment of Psychiatry and.ORCID 0000-0001-8874-2292
Martijn S van NoordenDepartment of Psychiatry and.
Serge A R B RomboutsInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6351-4779
Tobias H DonnerDepartment of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Amsterdam Center for Brain and Cognition, Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, 1001 NK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander NieuwenhuisInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2418-3879
Leiden University · NLUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe brain commonly exhibits spontaneous (i.e., in the absence of a task) fluctuations in neural activity that are correlated across brain regions. It has been established that the spatial structure, or topography, of these intrinsic correlations is in part determined by the fixed anatomical connectivity between regions. However, it remains unclear which factors dynamically sculpt this topography as a function of brain state. Potential candidate factors are subcortical catecholaminergic neuromodulatory systems, such as the locus ceruleus-norepinephrine system, which send diffuse projections to most parts of the forebrain. Here, we systematically characterized the effects of endogenous central neuromodulation on correlated fluctuations during rest in the human brain. Using a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover design, we pharmacologically increased synaptic catecholamine levels by administering atomoxetine, an NE transporter blocker, and examined the effects on the strength and spatial structure of resting-state MRI functional connectivity. First, atomoxetine reduced the strength of inter-regional correlations across three levels of spatial organization, indicating that catecholamines reduce the strength of functional interactions during rest. Second, this modulatory effect on intrinsic correlations exhibited a substantial degree of spatial specificity: the decrease in functional connectivity showed an anterior-posterior gradient in the cortex, depended on the strength of baseline functional connectivity, and was strongest for connections between regions belonging to distinct resting-state networks. Thus, catecholamines reduce intrinsic correlations in a spatially heterogeneous fashion. We conclude that neuromodulation is an important factor shaping the topography of intrinsic functional connectivity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The human brain shows spontaneous activity that is strongly correlated across brain regions. The factors that dynamically sculpt these inter-regional correlation patterns are poorly understood. Here, we test the hypothesis that they are shaped by the catecholaminergic neuromodulators norepinephrine and dopamine. We pharmacologically increased synaptic catecholamine levels and measured the resulting changes in intrinsic fMRI functional connectivity. At odds with common understanding of catecholamine function, we found (1) overall reduced inter-regional correlations across several levels of spatial organization; and (2) a remarkable spatial specificity of this modulatory effect. Our results identify norepinephrine and dopamine as important factors shaping intrinsic functional connectivity and advance our understanding of catecholamine function in the central nervous system.

Indexed as

Adrenergic NeuronsAdultCatecholaminesCerebral CortexConnectomeDopaminergic NeuronsDouble-Blind MethodHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeural PathwaysPlacebo EffectRestYoung AdultCatecholaminescatecholaminesfunctional connectivitygainneuromodulationnorepinephrineresting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID27466332
PMCPMC6601880
OpenAlexW2501157810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.