Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27483345›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2016

The role of the dopamine D1 receptor in social cognition: studies using a novel genetic rat model.

Judith R Homberg, Jocelien D A Olivier, Marie VandenBroeke, Jiun Youn, Arabella K Ellenbroek, Peter Karel, Ling Shan, Ruben van Boxtel, Sharon Ooms, Monique Balemans and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A Virtual In Vivo Dissection and Analysis of Socioaffective Symptoms Related to Cerebellum-Midbrain Reward Circuitry in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. AnbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Judith R HombergDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9108-7188
Jocelien D A OlivierDepartment of Neurobiology, Unit Behavioural Neuroscience, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 CC, The Netherlands j.d.a.olivier@rug.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4654-9763
Marie VandenBroekeVictoria University of Wellington, School of Psychology, PO Box 600, Wellington 6040, New Zealand.
Jiun YounVictoria University of Wellington, School of Psychology, PO Box 600, Wellington 6040, New Zealand.
Arabella K EllenbroekVictoria University of Wellington, School of Psychology, PO Box 600, Wellington 6040, New Zealand.
Peter KarelDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, The Netherlands.
Ling ShanDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, The Netherlands.
Ruben van BoxtelHubrecht Institute, KNAW and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CT, The Netherlands.
Sharon OomsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, The Netherlands.
Monique BalemansDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline LangedijkDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, The Netherlands.
Mareike MullerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, The Netherlands.
Gert VriendCMBI, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 26-28, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Alexander R CoolsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, The Netherlands.
Edwin CuppenHubrecht Institute, KNAW and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CT, The Netherlands.
Bart A EllenbroekVictoria University of Wellington, School of Psychology, PO Box 600, Wellington 6040, New Zealand.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLVictoria University of Wellington · NZUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social cognition is an endophenotype that is impaired in schizophrenia and several other (comorbid) psychiatric disorders. One of the modulators of social cognition is dopamine, but its role is not clear. The effects of dopamine are mediated through dopamine receptors, including the dopamine D1 receptor (Drd1). Because current Drd1 receptor agonists are not Drd1 selective, pharmacological tools are not sufficient to delineate the role of the Drd1. Here, we describe a novel rat model with a genetic mutation in Drd1 in which we measured basic behavioural phenotypes and social cognition. The I116S mutation was predicted to render the receptor less stable. In line with this computational prediction, this Drd1 mutation led to a decreased transmembrane insertion of Drd1, whereas Drd1 expression, as measured by Drd1 mRNA levels, remained unaffected. Owing to decreased transmembrane Drd1 insertion, the mutant rats displayed normal basic motoric and neurological parameters, as well as locomotor activity and anxiety-like behaviour. However, measures of social cognition like social interaction, scent marking, pup ultrasonic vocalizations and sociability, were strongly reduced in the mutant rats. This profile of the Drd1 mutant rat offers the field of neuroscience a novel genetic rat model to study a series of psychiatric disorders including schizophrenia, autism, depression, bipolar disorder and drug addiction.

Indexed as

CognitionModels, GeneticSocial BehaviorAnimalsCell MembraneDisease Models, AnimalExploratory BehaviorGroomingLigandsMaleMaze LearningModels, MolecularMutationRats, WistarReceptors, Dopamine D1UltrasonicsLigandsReceptors, Dopamine D1CharacterizationDopamine D1 receptorMutant ratSchizophreniaSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID27483345
PMCPMC5087833
OpenAlexW2397347672

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.