Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27490892›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Metabolic Responses to L-Glutamine of Livers from Rats with Diabetes Types 1 and 2.

Jurandir Fernando Comar, Denise Silva de Oliveira, Livia Bracht, Fumie Suzuki Kemmelmeier, Rosane Marina Peralta, Adelar Bracht

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Anthocyanin Extracts from Bilberry (Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Metabolic syndrome in children (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jurandir Fernando ComarLaboratory of Liver Metabolism, University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, Brazil.
Denise Silva de OliveiraLaboratory of Liver Metabolism, University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, Brazil.
Livia BrachtLaboratory of Liver Metabolism, University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, Brazil.
Fumie Suzuki KemmelmeierLaboratory of Liver Metabolism, University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, Brazil.
Rosane Marina PeraltaLaboratory of Liver Metabolism, University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, Brazil.
Adelar BrachtLaboratory of Liver Metabolism, University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several claims about the beneficial effects of supplementing L-glutamine to both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The purpose of the present study was to provide detailed knowledge about the fate of this amino acid in the liver, the first organ that receives the compound when ingested orally. The study was done using the isolated perfused rat liver, an experimental system that preserves the microcirculation of the organ and that allows to measured several parameters during steady-state and pre steady-state conditions. L-Glutamine was infused in the portal vein (5 mM) and several parameters were monitored. Livers from type 1 diabetic rats showed an accelerated response to L-glutamine infusion. In consequence of this accelerated response livers from type 1 diabetic rats presented higher rates of ammonia, urea, glucose and lactate output during the first 25-30 minutes following L-glutamine infusion. As steady-state conditions approached, however, the difference between type 1 diabetes and control livers tended to disappear. Measurement of the glycogen content over a period of 100 minutes revealed that, excepting the initial phase of the L-glutamine infusion, the increased glucose output in livers from type 1 diabetic rats was mainly due to accelerated glycogenolysis. Livers from type 2 diabetic rats behaved similarly to control livers with no accelerated glucose output but with increased L-alanine production. L-Alanine is important for the pancreatic β-cells and from this point of view the oral intake of L-glutamine can be regarded as beneficial. Furthermore, the lack of increased glucose output in livers from type 2 diabetic rats is consistent with observations that even daily L-glutamine doses of 30 g do not increase the glycemic levels in well controlled type 2 diabetes patients.

Indexed as

AlanineAmmoniaAnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2GluconeogenesisGlucoseGlutamineGlycogenLactic AcidLiverMaleOxygenRatsRats, WistarUreaAlanineAmmoniaGlucoseGlutamineGlycogenLactic AcidOxygenUrea

Identifiers

PMID27490892
PMCPMC4973899
OpenAlexW2484443452

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.