ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Metrics for rapid quality control in RNA structure probing experiments.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Workflow for Identifying Helicase-Dependent RNA Structural Changes in Transcriptional Termination: From DMS Sequencing Analysis to Reporter Assay-Based Validation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Deep learning for RNA secondary structure determination: gauging generalizability and broadening the scope of traditional methods.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Deep Learning for RNA Secondary Structure Determination: Gauging Generalizability and Broadening the Scope of Traditional Methods.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- diffBUM-HMM: a robust statistical modeling approach for detecting RNA flexibility changes in high-throughput structure probing data.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Discovery of DEAD-Box RNA Helicase Targets Reveals RNA Structural Remodeling in Transcription Termination.Genetics · 2019Article
- dStruct: identifying differentially reactive regions from RNA structurome profiling data.Genome biology · 2019Article
- High-throughput determination of RNA structures.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018Review
- Article
- Probing of RNA structures in a positive sense RNA virus reveals selection pressures for structural elements.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- PATTERNA: transcriptome-wide search for functional RNA elements via structural data signatures.Genome biology · 2018Article
- Statistical modeling of RNA structure profiling experiments enables parsimonious reconstruction of structure landscapes.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Article
- Comparative and integrative analysis of RNA structural profiling data: current practices and emerging questions.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2017Article
- SEQualyzer: interactive tool for quality control and exploratory analysis of high-throughput RNA structural profiling data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe diverse functionalities of RNA can be attributed to its capacity to form complex and varied structures. The recent proliferation of new structure probing techniques coupled with high-throughput sequencing has helped RNA studies expand in both scope and depth. Despite differences in techniques, most experiments face similar challenges in reproducibility due to the stochastic nature of chemical probing and sequencing. As these protocols expand to transcriptome-wide studies, quality control becomes a more daunting task. General and efficient methodologies are needed to quantify variability and quality in the wide range of current and emerging structure probing experiments.
resultsWe develop metrics to rapidly and quantitatively evaluate data quality from structure probing experiments, demonstrating their efficacy on both small synthetic libraries and transcriptome-wide datasets. We use a signal-to-noise ratio concept to evaluate replicate agreement, which has the capacity to identify high-quality data. We also consider and compare two methods to assess variability inherent in probing experiments, which we then utilize to evaluate the coverage adjustments needed to meet desired quality. The developed metrics and tools will be useful in summarizing large-scale datasets and will help standardize quality control in the field. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data and methods used in this article are freely available at: http://bme.ucdavis.edu/aviranlab/SPEQC_software CONTACT: saviran@ucdavis.eduSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.