Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27497441›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

Metrics for rapid quality control in RNA structure probing experiments.

Krishna Choudhary, Nathan P Shih, Fei Deng, Mirko Ledda, Bo Li, Sharon Aviran

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-throughput determination of RNA structures.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krishna ChoudharyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Genome Center, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Nathan P ShihDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Genome Center, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Fei DengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Genome Center, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Mirko LeddaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Genome Center, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Bo LiCenter for RNA Systems Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Sharon AviranDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Genome Center, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

PROJECT 3P50GM102706 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CATE, JAMIE H · 2012 to 2016
$9.5M
Methods for RNA structural analysis using computation and structure mapping experR00HG006860 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI AVIRAN, SHARON · 2014 to 2016
$725k
Methods for RNA structural analysis using computation and structure mapping experK99HG006860 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI AVIRAN, SHARON · 2012 to 2012
$103k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG006860NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG006860NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM102706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe diverse functionalities of RNA can be attributed to its capacity to form complex and varied structures. The recent proliferation of new structure probing techniques coupled with high-throughput sequencing has helped RNA studies expand in both scope and depth. Despite differences in techniques, most experiments face similar challenges in reproducibility due to the stochastic nature of chemical probing and sequencing. As these protocols expand to transcriptome-wide studies, quality control becomes a more daunting task. General and efficient methodologies are needed to quantify variability and quality in the wide range of current and emerging structure probing experiments.

resultsWe develop metrics to rapidly and quantitatively evaluate data quality from structure probing experiments, demonstrating their efficacy on both small synthetic libraries and transcriptome-wide datasets. We use a signal-to-noise ratio concept to evaluate replicate agreement, which has the capacity to identify high-quality data. We also consider and compare two methods to assess variability inherent in probing experiments, which we then utilize to evaluate the coverage adjustments needed to meet desired quality. The developed metrics and tools will be useful in summarizing large-scale datasets and will help standardize quality control in the field. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data and methods used in this article are freely available at: http://bme.ucdavis.edu/aviranlab/SPEQC_software CONTACT: saviran@ucdavis.eduSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyModels, StatisticalQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsRNASequence Analysis, RNASignal-To-Noise RatioRNA

Identifiers

PMID27497441
PMCPMC5181532
OpenAlexW2480578423

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.