Who was studied, and how
Two numbers in the abstract
Where each one falls
Only readable comparisons vote
Where it lands on the map
2,969people with hypertension, in this paper
The trial randomly assignedassigned by chance
targeted, nurse-led case finding for CVD prevention
no intervention (unexposed period)
Raised assessment of lipid levels+26.4
Raised proportion of high-risk patients prescribed antihypertensives or statins+15.5
randomisedthe abstract, start to end
… temporal effects the risk difference was 15.5% (95% CI = 3.9 to 27.1, P = …
… lipid levels increased significantly, at 26.4% (99% CI = 5.3 to 47.5, P = …
← favours treatmentfavours comparator →
could be chanceProportion of high-risk patients prescribed antihypertensives or statinstargeted, nurse-led case finding for CVD prevention vs no intervention (unexposed period)
15.53.90–27.1
Assessment of lipid levelstargeted, nurse-led case finding for CVD prevention vs no intervention (unexposed period)
26.45.30–47.5
Digital & care-deliveryLipidsBlood pressure
1 / 5