Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27547230›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2016

Randomized, Double-Blinded, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled, and Multiple-Dose Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Mulberry Twig (Ramulus Mori, Sangzhi) Alkaloid Tablet and Acarbose in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Mengyi Li, Xuemin Huang, Hui Ye, Yao Chen, Jing Yu, Jinxia Yang, Xuezhi Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Mulberry Twig Alkaloids Combined With Insulin Infusion: Effects on Blood Glucose Variability in Type 2 Diabetes.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Nutrients · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mengyi LiDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1950-6752
Xuemin HuangDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6410-5640
Hui YeDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7607-627X
Yao ChenDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100007, China.
Jing YuDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3815-8391
Jinxia YangDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2838-139X
Xuezhi ZhangDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4564-7989
Peking University · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mulberry twig alkaloid (SZ-A) tablet compared with acarbose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods. This clinical trial enrolled 38 patients who were randomized into two groups (SZ-A: 23; acarbose: 15) and were treated for 24 weeks. Patients and clinical trial staffs were masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary outcome measures were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and 1-hour and 2-hour postprandial and fasting plasma glucose levels from baseline to the end of treatment. Analysis included all patients who completed this study. Results. By the end of this study, HbA1c level in SZ-A group was decreased from baseline significantly (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found when compared with acarbose group (P = 0.652). Similarly, 1-hour and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose levels in SZ-A group were decreased from baseline statistically (P < 0.05), without any significant differences compared with acarbose group (P = 0.748 and 0.558, resp.). The fasting plasma glucose levels were not significantly changed in both groups. One of 23 patients in SZ-A group (4.76%) and 5 of 15 patients in acarbose group (33.33%) suffered from gastrointestinal adverse events. Conclusions. Compared with acarbose, SZ-A tablet was effective and safe in glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Identifiers

PMID27547230
PMCPMC4980533
OpenAlexW2481637708

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.