Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27554449›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2016

Are aberrant phase transitions a driver of cellular aging?

Simon Alberti, Anthony A Hyman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Shift of the insoluble content of the proteome in the aging mouse brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Embracing non-linearity in human ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon AlbertiMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany. alberti@mpi-cbg.de.
Anthony A HymanMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany. hyman@mpi-cbg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why do cells age? Recent advances show that the cytoplasm is organized into many membrane-less compartments via a process known as phase separation, which ensures spatiotemporal control over diffusion-limited biochemical reactions. Although phase separation is a powerful mechanism to organize biochemical reactions, it comes with the trade-off that it is extremely sensitive to changes in physical-chemical parameters, such as protein concentration, pH, or cellular energy levels. Here, we highlight recent findings showing that age-related neurodegenerative diseases are linked to aberrant phase transitions in neurons. We discuss how these aberrant phase transitions could be tied to a failure to maintain physiological physical-chemical conditions. We generalize this idea to suggest that the process of cellular aging involves a progressive loss of the organization of phase-separated compartments in the cytoplasm.

Indexed as

Cell CompartmentationCellular SenescencePhase TransitionAnimalsHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuronsagingamyotrophic lateral sclerosischaperoneintrinsically disordered proteinmitochondrianeurodegenerationphase separationprotein aggregationprotein quality control

Identifiers

PMID27554449
PMCPMC5108435

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.