Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27556752›Full record

ReviewPlastic and reconstructive surgery2016

Cutaneous Imaging Technologies in Acute Burn and Chronic Wound Care.

Chandan K Sen, Subhadip Ghatak, Surya C Gnyawali, Sashwati Roy, Gayle M Gordillo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Burn Progression in Human Skin-A Review of Current Knowledge and Opportunities for Future Research.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Triage ofBiomedical optics express · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chandan K SenColumbus, Ohio.
Subhadip GhatakColumbus, Ohio.
Surya C GnyawaliColumbus, Ohio.
Sashwati RoyColumbus, Ohio.
Gayle M GordilloColumbus, Ohio.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Wound Healing Endpoint and RecurrenceR01NR015676 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GORDILLO, GAYLE M, ROY, SASHWATI · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
Redox Control of Wound HealingR01GM069589 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2004 to 2013
$2.3M
Tissue Oxygenation and Wound HealingR01GM077185 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2007 to 2016
$2.3M
Biofilms and Immunity in Chronic WoundsR01NR013898 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K, WOZNIAK, DANIEL J · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Novel Regulators of Wound AngiogenesisR01GM108014 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069589NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077185NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108014NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013898NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWound assessment relies on visual evaluation by physicians. Such assessment is largely subjective and presents the opportunity to explore the use of emergent technologies.

methodsEmergent and powerful noninvasive imaging technologies applicable to assess burn and chronic wounds are reviewed.

resultsThe need to estimate wound depth is critical in both chronic wound and burn injury settings. Harmonic ultrasound technology is powerful to study wound depth. It addresses the limitations of optical imaging with limited depth of penetration. What if a wound appears epithelialized by visual inspection, which shows no discharge yet is covered by repaired skin that lacks barrier function? In this case although the wound is closed as defined by current standards, it remains functionally open, presenting the risk of infection and other postclosure complications. Thus, assessment of skin barrier function is valuable in the context of assessing wound closure. Options for the study of tissue vascularization are many. If noncontact and noninvasive criteria are of importance, laser speckle imaging is powerful. Fluorescence imaging is standard in several clinical settings and is likely to serve the wound clinics well as long as indocyanine green injection is not of concern. A major advantage of harmonic ultrasound imaging of wound depth is that the same system is capable of providing information on blood flow dynamics in arterial perforators.

conclusionWith many productive imaging platforms to choose from, wound care is about to be transformed by technology that would help assess wound severity.

Indexed as

BurnsChronic DiseaseHumansSkinWound HealingWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID27556752
PMCPMC5207795
OpenAlexW2513796749

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.