ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2016
Long term effect and safety of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells on type 2 diabetes.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of intravascular administration of umbilical-cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in patients with Diabetes Mellitus - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- A meta-analysis on application and prospect of cell therapy in the treatment of diabetes mellitus.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of stem cell therapy for diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Meta-analysis shows that mesenchymal stem cell therapy can be a possible treatment for diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation therapy for type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell therapy on glucose levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Therapeutic efficacy of umbilical cord-derived stem cells for diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis study.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of human umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.World journal of diabetes · 2022Trial
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus duration and obesity alter the efficacy of autologously transplanted bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021Trial
- Stem cell therapies for treatment of diabetes mellitus.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- Critical evaluation of compositions and clinical relevance of Wharton's jelly-derived biologics.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for type 2 diabetes: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and future directions.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells in treating human diseases: molecular mechanisms and clinical studies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Autologous and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies for diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of stem cells · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for type 1 & 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Advancements in diabetes research and stem cell therapy: a concise review.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- Extracellular Vesicles from Different Mesenchymal Stem Cell Types Exhibit Distinctive Surface Protein Profiling and Molecular Characteristics: A Comparative Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in type 2 diabetes: a pilot clinical trial.American journal of stem cells · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular therapies offer novel opportunities for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The present study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of infusion of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSC) on T2DM. A total of 61 patients with T2DM were randomly divided into two groups on the basis of basal therapy; patients in group I were administered WJ-MSC intravenous infusion twice, with a four-week interval, and patients in group II were treated with normal saline as control. During the 36-month follow-up period, the occurrence of any adverse effects and the results of clinical and laboratory examinations were recorded and evaluated. The lack of acute or chronic adverse effects in group I was consistent with group II.. Blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, C-peptide, homeostasis model assessment of pancreatic islet β-cell function and incidence of diabetic complications in group I were significantly improved, as compared with group II during the 36-month follow-up. The results of the present study demonstrated that infusion of WJ-MSC improved the function of islet β-cells and reduced the incidence of diabetic complications, although the precise mechanisms are yet to be elucidated. The infusion of WJ-MSC may be an effective option for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.