Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27600069›Full record

ReviewMicroarrays (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Glycoarray Technologies: Deciphering Interactions from Proteins to Live Cell Responses.

Tania M Puvirajesinghe, Jeremy E Turnbull

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of Chondroitin Sulfation Following Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  6. Glycans in drug discovery.MedChemComm · 2019
    Review
  7. Advancing Solutions to the Carbohydrate Sequencing Challenge.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Glycosaminoglycanomics: where we are.Glycoconjugate journal · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tania M PuvirajesingheCRCM (Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille), Cell Polarity, Cell Signalling and Cancer "Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer", Inserm, U1068, Marseille F-13009, France. taniap@liverpool.ac.uk.
Jeremy E TurnbullCentre for Glycobiology, Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK. j.turnbull@liverpool.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarray technologies inspired the development of carbohydrate arrays. Initially, carbohydrate array technology was hindered by the complex structures of glycans and their structural variability. The first designs of glycoarrays focused on the HTP (high throughput) study of protein-glycan binding events, and subsequently more in-depth kinetic analysis of carbohydrate-protein interactions. However, the applications have rapidly expanded and now achieve successful discrimination of selective interactions between carbohydrates and, not only proteins, but also viruses, bacteria and eukaryotic cells, and most recently even live cell responses to immobilized glycans. Combining array technology with other HTP technologies such as mass spectrometry is expected to allow even more accurate and sensitive analysis. This review provides a broad overview of established glycoarray technologies (with a special focus on glycosaminoglycan applications) and their emerging applications to the study of complex interactions between glycans and whole living cells.

Indexed as

glycobioarraysglycoconjugatesglycomicsheparan sulfatesaccharide libraries

Identifiers

PMID27600069
PMCPMC5003448

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.