Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27625393›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2016

Identifying proteins that bind to specific RNAs - focus on simple repeat expansion diseases.

Magdalena Jazurek, Adam Ciesiolka, Julia Starega-Roslan, Katarzyna Bilinska, Wlodzimierz J Krzyzosiak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomarkers of tumor invasiveness in proteomics (Review).International journal of oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Emerging mechanisms of elastin transcriptional regulation.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. RNA-protein interaction mapping via MS2- or Cas13-based APEX targeting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magdalena JazurekDepartment of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland.
Adam CiesiolkaDepartment of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland.
Julia Starega-RoslanDepartment of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna BilinskaDepartment of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland.
Wlodzimierz J KrzyzosiakDepartment of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland wlodkrzy@ibch.poznan.pl.
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-protein complexes play a central role in the regulation of fundamental cellular processes, such as mRNA splicing, localization, translation and degradation. The misregulation of these interactions can cause a variety of human diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Recently, many strategies have been developed to comprehensively analyze these complex and highly dynamic RNA-protein networks. Extensive efforts have been made to purify in vivo-assembled RNA-protein complexes. In this review, we focused on commonly used RNA-centric approaches that involve mass spectrometry, which are powerful tools for identifying proteins bound to a given RNA. We present various RNA capture strategies that primarily depend on whether the RNA of interest is modified. Moreover, we briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of in vitro and in vivo approaches. Furthermore, we describe recent advances in quantitative proteomics as well as the methods that are most commonly used to validate robust mass spectrometry data. Finally, we present approaches that have successfully identified expanded repeat-binding proteins, which present abnormal RNA-protein interactions that result in the development of many neurological diseases.

Indexed as

DNA Repeat ExpansionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAnimalsAptamers, NucleotideBacterial ProteinsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsEndoribonucleasesGenetic Association StudiesHumansMass SpectrometryProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsRNARNA, AntisenseRNA-Binding ProteinsAptamers, NucleotideBacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsCsy4 endoribonuclease, Pseudomonas aeruginosaEndoribonucleasesRNARNA, AntisenseRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27625393
PMCPMC5100574
OpenAlexW2519557303

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.