ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2016
Approach to preventive care in the elderly.
Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to prevent, delay or reverse frailty in older people: a journey towards clinical guidelines.BMC medicine · 2019Guideline
- Role of family medicine on health systems in the Americas: scoping review.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- Evolution of the roles of family physicians through collaboration with rehabilitation therapists in rural community hospitals: a grounded theory approach.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Perceived Barriers Among Clinicians and Older Adults Aged 65 and Older Regarding Use of Life Expectancy to Inform Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review and Comparison.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2023Review
- Does information by pharmacists convince the public to get vaccinated for pneumococcal disease and herpes zoster?Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- Adaptation and Initial Validation of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Mortality Risk Index to MDS Version 3.0.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo guide family physicians in creating preventive screening and treatment plans for their elderly patients. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The MEDLINE database was searched for Canadian guidelines on primary health care and the elderly; guidelines or meta-analyses or practice guidelines or systematic reviews related to mass screening in those aged 80 and older and the frail elderly, limited to between 2006 and July 2016; and articles on preventive health services for the elderly related to family practice or family physicians, limited to English-language publications between 2012 and July 2016. MAIN MESSAGE: Estimating life expectancy is not an easy or precise science, but frailty is an emerging concept that can help with this. The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care offers cancer screening guidelines, but they are less clear for patients older than 74 years and management plans need to be individualized. Estimating remaining years of life helps guide your recommendations for preventive screening and treatment plans. Risks often increase along with an increase in frailty and comorbidity. Conversely, benefits often diminish as life expectancy decreases. Preventive management plans should take into account the patient's perspective and be mutually agreed upon. A mnemonic device for key primary care preventive areas-CCFP, short for cancer, cardiovascular disease, falls and osteoporosis, and preventive immunizations-might be useful.
conclusionFamily physicians might find addressing the following areas helpful when considering a preventive health intervention: age, life expectancy (including concept of frailty), comorbidities and functional status, risks and benefits of screening or treatment, and values and preferences of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27629666PMC5023341W2523415415What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.