Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27645263›Full record

ReviewSpinal cord2016

Vitamin D and spinal cord injury: should we care?

J Lamarche, G Mailhot

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Spinal cord, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04400747 (The Effects of Single High-dose or Daily Low Dosage Oral Colecalciferol Treatment on Muscle Strength, Muscle Thickness and Independence in Spinal Cord Lesion), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04400747 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Single High-dose or Daily Low Dosage Oral Colecalciferol Treatment on Muscle Strength, Muscle Thickness and Independence in Spinal Cord Lesion

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research HospitalRan2020 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuryArmsVitamin D3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Vitamins in Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanisms and Benefits.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2024
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J LamarcheCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, CIUSS Centre-Sud-Montreal Gingras-Lindsay Rehabilitation Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
G MailhotResearch Centre, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CACentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designNarrative review.

objectivesThis review provides an overview of the etiological factors and consequences of vitamin D insufficiency in relation to spinal cord injury (SCI) as well as important considerations for vitamin D supplementation.

settingMontreal, Canada.

methodsLiterature search.

resultsVitamin D insufficiency is common in SCI individuals owing to the presence of many contributing factors including limited sun exposure and intake, use of medication and endocrine perturbations. Although there are several biological plausible mechanisms by which vitamin D may act upon musculoskeletal and cardiometabolic health, the impact of vitamin D insufficiency on such systems remains ill defined in SCI. In the absence of guidelines for the management of vitamin D insufficiency in this high-risk population and in an attempt to provide clinical guidance, considerations for vitamin D supplementation such as the type of vitamin D, dosing regimens and toxicity are discussed and tentative recommendations suggested with particular reference to issues faced by SCI patients.

conclusionAlthough high rates of vitamin D insufficiency are encountered in SCI individuals, its consequences and the amount of vitamin D required to prevent insufficiency are still unknown, indicating a need for more intervention studies with well-defined outcome measures. Routine screening and monitoring of vitamin D as well as treatment of suboptimal status should be instituted in both acute and chronic setting. The close interactions between vitamin D and related bone minerals should be kept in mind when supplementing SCI individuals, and practices should be individualized with clinical conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansSpinal Cord InjuriesVitamin D Deficiency

Identifiers

PMID27645263
OpenAlexW2521792219

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.