Evidence mapPaperPMID 27679663Full record

ReviewJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2017

Investigating what works to support family carers of people with dementia: a rapid realist review.

M Parkinson, S M Carr, R Rushmer, C Abley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Negative Impact and Positive Value of Caregiving in Spouse Carers of Persons with Dementia in Sweden.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

M ParkinsonFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK.
S M CarrFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK.
R RushmerFuse, Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
C AbleyInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in longevity and medicine mean that many more people in the UK survive life-threatening diseases but are instead susceptible to life-limiting diseases such as dementia. Within the next 10 years those affected by dementia in the UK is set to rise to over 1 million, making reliance on family care of people with dementia (PWD) essential. A central challenge is how to improve family carer support to offset the demands made by dementia care which can jeopardise carers' own health. This review investigates 'what works to support family carers of PWD'. Methods: Rapid realist review of a comprehensive range of databases. Results: Five key themes emerged: (1) extending social assets, (2) strengthening key psychological resources, (3) maintaining physical health status, (4) safeguarding quality of life and (5) ensuring timely availability of key external resources. It is hypothesized that these five factors combine and interact to provide critical biopsychosocial and service support that bolsters carer 'resilience' and supports the maintenance and sustenance of family care of PWD. Conclusions: 'Resilience-building' is central to 'what works to support family carers of PWD'. The resulting model and Programme Theories respond to the burgeoning need for a coherent approach to carer support.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdaptation, PsychologicalCaregiversDatabases, FactualDementiaHealth StatusHumansQuality of LifeUnited Kingdomadult resilienceAlzheimer's diseasedementiafamily carersrealist review

Identifiers

PMID27679663
PMCPMC5939885
OpenAlexW2523915500

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.