ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016
Perinatal health care services for imprisoned pregnant women and associated outcomes: a systematic review.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Needs of Incarcerated Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review of Literature.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2022Pooled it
- Obstetric Violence Against Female Prisoners in Spain: Experiences and Violations of Rights.Journal of pregnancy · 2026Article
- The impact of maternal incarceration on mothers and children: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- A qualitative analysis of formerly incarcerated women's perspectives on a prison-based perinatal support program.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Maternal health and incarceration: advancing pregnancy justice through research.Health & justice · 2025Article
- Determinants of access to primary healthcare for formerly incarcerated women transitioning into the community: a systematic review of the literature.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- A rapid review of the evidence on models of service delivery for correctional centre-based mothers and children's units: does our approach need to change?BMJ global health · 2024Review
- Custodial and perinatal care patterns of women who received prenatal care while incarcerated in the Arkansas state prison system, 2014-2019.Health & justice · 2024Article
- Are custodial-based mothers and children's units evaluated, effective and aligned with a human rights-based approach? - A systematic review of the evidence.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- How are the Dietary Needs of Pregnant Incarcerated Women Being Met? A Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- The experience of pregnant women in contexts of vulnerability of prenatal primary nursing care: a descriptive interpretative qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- "Women & criminal justice · 2023Article
- Addressing health disparities in the criminal legal system: Translational benefits, challenges, and facilitators of impactful research with incarcerated pregnant women.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Navigating pregnancy and early motherhood in prison: a thematic analysis of mothers' experiences.Health & justice · 2022Article
- The needs and experiences of mothers while in prison and post-release: a rapid review and thematic synthesis.Health & justice · 2021Article
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes among incarcerated women who gave birth in custody.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2021Article
- "I Wish I Could Hold Your Hand": Inconsistent Interactions Between Pregnant Women and Prison Officers.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2021Article
- Leaving no one behind in prison: improving the health of people in prison as a key contributor to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals 2030.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Ethical guidance for health research in prisons in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Public health · 2020Article
- Quality of Antenatal Care for Women Who Experience Imprisonment in Ontario, Canada.JAMA network open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen are an increasing minority of prisoners worldwide, and most are of childbearing age. Prisons offer unique opportunities for improving the pregnancy outcomes of these high-risk women, and no systematic review to date has looked at their care. This systematic review identified studies describing models of perinatal health care for imprisoned women which report maternal and child health and care outcomes.
methodsWe systematically searched for literature published between 1980 and April 2014. Studies were eligible if they included a group of imprisoned pregnant women, a description of perinatal health care and any maternal or infant health or care outcomes. Two authors independently extracted data. We described relevant outcomes in prisons (including jails) under models of care we termed PRISON, PRISON+ and PRISON++, depending on the care provided. Where outcomes were available on a comparison group of women, we calculated odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals.
resultsEighteen studies were reported, comprising 2001 imprisoned pregnant women. Fifteen were in the US, two in the UK and one in Germany. Nine contained a comparison group of women comprising 849 pregnant women. Study quality was variable and outcome reporting was inconsistent. There was some evidence that women in prisons receiving enhanced prison care, PRISON+, were less likely to have inadequate prenatal care (15.4 % vs 30.7 %, p < 0 · 001), preterm delivery (6.4 % vs 19.0 %, p = 0 · 001) or caesarean delivery (12.9 % vs 26.5 %, p = 0 · 005) compared to women in prisons receiving usual care (PRISON). Women participating in two PRISON++ interventions, that is, interventions which included not only enhanced care in prisons but also coordination of community care on release, demonstrated reductions in long term recidivism rates (summary OR 0 · 37, 95 % CI 0 · 19-0 · 70) compared to pregnant women in the same prisons who did not participate in the intervention.
conclusionsEnhanced perinatal care can improve both short and long-term outcomes but there is a lack of data. Properly designed programmes with rigorous evaluation are needed to address the needs of this vulnerable population. The cost to mothers, children and to society of failing to address these important public health issues are likely to be substantial.
trial registrationPROSPERO registration: CRD42012002384 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.