Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716253›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2016

Nurse-administered intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF: study protocol for noninferiority randomized controlled trial of safety, cost and patient satisfaction.

Dordi Austeng, Tora Sund Morken, Stine Bolme, Turid Follestad, Vidar Halsteinli

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02359149 (Intravitreal Injections by Nurses or Physicians), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02359149 nacompletednot on this map

Intravitreal Injections by Nurses or Physicians: a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Efficacy, Patient Satisfaction and Health Economy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Olavs HospitalRan2015 to 2017Enrolled328ConditionsEye DiseasesArmsintravitreal injections given by a nurse, intravitreal injections given by a physician, Intravitreal injections, Anti-VEGF agents
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dordi AustengDepartment of Ophthalmology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. dordi.austeng@ntnu.no.
Tora Sund MorkenDepartment of Ophthalmology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Stine BolmeDepartment of Ophthalmology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Turid FollestadDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Vidar HalsteinliRegional Center for Healthcare Improvement, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
St Olav's University Hospital · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) now improve or stabilize visual acuity in a number of previously untreatable eye diseases, of which the main are age-related macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion and diabetic macular edema. Most patients require multiple injections over lengthy periods of time and the prevalence of treatable conditions is increasing. Anti-VEGF IVI normally administered by physicians, therefore represent a considerable workload on ophthalmologic clinics and will continue to do so in the near future. Nurse-administered IVI may relieve this workload, but the safety, cost and patient satisfaction of such an extended role for nurses in ophthalmologic clinics has not earlier been investigated. To investigate these outcomes following independent anti-VEGF IVI by trained nurses, a noninferiority randomized controlled trial is being conducted. METHODS/

designPatients eligible for anti-VEGF treatment, minimum 304, are recruited and randomized to IVI administration by either trained nurses or physicians. The primary outcome is safety, measured by difference in mean change in visual acuity between the two groups during an observation period of 12 months. Secondary outcomes are incidence of ocular adverse events, cost per patient and patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION: This study protocol describes the design of the first randomized controlled trial of nurse-administered IVI of anti-VEGF. The study is designed to examine safety, cost and patient satisfaction during 12 months follow-up.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02359149 . Registered February 4, 2015.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Nurses'AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMalePatient SafetyPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesRetinal DiseasesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAge-related macular degenerationAnti-VEGFDiabetic macular edemaIntravitreal injectionNurseRandomized controlled trialRetinal vein occlusion

Identifiers

PMID27716253
PMCPMC5045663
OpenAlexW2527408359

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.