ReviewInternational journal of clinical practice2016
Very low LDL-C levels may safely provide additional clinical cardiovascular benefit: the evidence to date.
Review in International journal of clinical practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advances in engineering the production of the natural red pigment lycopene: A systematic review from a biotechnology perspective.Journal of advanced research · 2023Pooled it
- Lipid-lowering therapy treatment regimens in high- and very high-risk patients for the prevention of cardiovascular events: results from the Irish cohort of the multinational, observational SANTORINI study.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Observational
- Cumulative exposure to atherogenic lipoprotein particles in young adults and subsequent incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of patient-oriented intervention in primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statins: Open-label randomized study.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Moderate-Intensity Statin Plus Ezetimibe: Time to Rethink it as an Optimal Initial Lipid-Lowering Strategy.Drugs · 2025Review
- Low LDL-C: Is It all Good News?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Targeting PCSK9 as a key player in lipid metabolism: exploiting the therapeutic and biosensing potential of aptamers.Lipids in health and disease · 2024Review
- Cholesterol-Lowering Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: The Importance of Intensive Treatment and the Simplification of Medical Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Novel and Emerging LDL-C Lowering Strategies: A New Era of Dyslipidemia Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Exploring the Association between Low-Density Lipoprotein Subfractions and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes-A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Patients' Adherence to PCSK9 Inhibitors Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Statin treatment and LDL-cholesterol treatment goal attainment among individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care.Open heart · 2021Article
- A critical review of chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for coronary artery disease.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021Review
- Management of Dyslipidemia in Women and Men with Coronary Heart Disease: Results from POLASPIRE Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Extremely Low LDL-Cholesterol Levels and Its Prospects in Hyperlipidemia Management.Journal of lipids · 2018Review
- Statin-ezetimibe versus statin lipid-lowering therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Article
- 2022 Saudi Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in Europe and increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major contributor to CVD risk. Extensive evidence from clinical studies of statins has demonstrated a linear relationship between LDL-C levels and CVD risk. It has been proposed that lower LDL-C levels than those currently recommended may provide additional clinical benefit to patients.
aimThis review summarises the genetic and clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of achieving very low LDL-C levels.
methodsRelevant epidemiological and clinical studies were identified using PubMed and by searching abstracts published at major congresses.
resultsGenetic evidence demonstrates that individuals with naturally very low LDL-C levels are healthy and have a low risk of CVD. Clinical evidence has shown that those patients who achieve very low LDL-C levels through using lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), such as statins, have reduced CVD risk compared with patients who only just achieve recommended target LDL-C levels. These data show that the incidence of adverse events in patients achieving very low LDL-C levels using LLT is comparable to those reaching the recommended LDL-C targets.
conclusionsGenetic and clinical evidence supports the concept that reduction in LDL-C levels below current recommended targets may provide additional clinical benefit to patients without adversely impacting patient safety. Statin add-on therapies, such as ezetimibe and the recently approved proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab, allow patients to achieve very low LDL-C levels and are likely to impact on future treatment paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.