SynthesisMedicine2016
Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A meta-analysis (a prisma-compliant study).
Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025Guideline
- Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Is It Necessary to Perform the Pharmacological Interventions for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2019Pooled it
- Integrating bile acid metabolism into precision nutrition strategies for improved swine performance.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026Review
- Exploring Maralixibat for Treatment-Resistant Pruritus in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy and Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Topical Lignocaine to Tide Over the Itch Crisis in Cholestasis of Pregnancy - A Biographical Case Report.Indian dermatology online journal · 2025Article
- Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions-A Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Bile acids as therapeutic agents.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Article
- Clinical Management Guidelines for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024Article
- Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Perinatal exposure to UDCA prevents neonatal cholestasis in Cyp2c70Pediatric research · 2023Article
- Imaging of pregnancy-related liver diseases.iLIVER · 2023Review
- Metabolic changes in bile acids with pregnancy progression and their correlation with perinatal complications in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnant patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Serum Bile Acids in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy (ICP), Versus Pregnant and Nonpregnant Controls in Asian Indian Women and a Proposed Scoring to Optimize Management in ICP.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2022Article
- Navigating Uncertainty: A Case Study of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2022Article
- The impact of assisted reproductive technology in twin pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis: a five-year retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- APASL clinical practice guidance: the diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis.Hepatology international · 2022Article
- Liver Diseases in the Parturient.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a specific pregnancy-related disorder without standard medical therapies. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the most used medicine, but the efficacy and safety of UDCA remain uncertain. Several meta-analyses had been made to assess the effects of UDCA in ICP. However, the samples were not large enough to convince obstetricians to use UDCA. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects and safety of UDCA in patients with ICP, which included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsSix databases were searched. The search terms were "ursodeoxycholicacid," "therapy," "management," "treatment," "intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy," "obstetric cholestasis," "recurrent jaundice of pregnancy," "pruritus gravidarum," "idiopathic jaundice of pregnancy," "intrahepatic jaundice of pregnancy," and "icterus gravidarum."Randomized controlled trials of UDCA versus control groups (included using other medicines) among patients with ICP were included. The primary outcomes were improved pruritus scores and liver function. Secondary outcomes were the maternal and fetal outcomes in patients with ICP.Data were extracted from included RCTs. The Mantel-Haenzel random-effects model or fixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis.
resultsA total of 12 RCTs involving 662 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In pooled analyses that compared UDCA with all controls, UDCA was associated with resolution of pruritus (risk ratio [RR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.12-2.52; P = 0.01),decrease of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.36; 95% CI, -2.08 to -0.63; P <0.001), reduced serum levels of bile acid (SMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.20; P <0.001), fewer premature births (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.72; P <0.001),reduced fetal distress (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.94; P = 0.02), high Apgar scores at 5 minutes (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82; P = 0.009), less frequent respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86; P = 0.02), and fewer neonates in the intensive care unit (NICU) (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.87; P <0.05), increased gestational age (SMD,0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63; P <0.001), and birth weight (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.02-0.40; P = 0.03). There were no differences in meconium staining and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) between the groups (P >0.05). No trials reported adverse effects on mothers and fetuses except nausea and emesis.
conclusionUDCA is effective and safe to improve pruritus and liver function in ICP. UDCA also reduced adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with ICP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.