Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27749550›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2016

Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A meta-analysis (a prisma-compliant study).

Xiang Kong, Yan Kong, Fangyuan Zhang, Tingting Wang, Jin Yan

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bile acids as therapeutic agents.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Management Guidelines for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Liver Diseases in the Parturient.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiang KongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yan Kong
Fangyuan Zhang
Tingting Wang
Jin Yan
Yangzhou University · CNNantong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a specific pregnancy-related disorder without standard medical therapies. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the most used medicine, but the efficacy and safety of UDCA remain uncertain. Several meta-analyses had been made to assess the effects of UDCA in ICP. However, the samples were not large enough to convince obstetricians to use UDCA. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects and safety of UDCA in patients with ICP, which included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsSix databases were searched. The search terms were "ursodeoxycholicacid," "therapy," "management," "treatment," "intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy," "obstetric cholestasis," "recurrent jaundice of pregnancy," "pruritus gravidarum," "idiopathic jaundice of pregnancy," "intrahepatic jaundice of pregnancy," and "icterus gravidarum."Randomized controlled trials of UDCA versus control groups (included using other medicines) among patients with ICP were included. The primary outcomes were improved pruritus scores and liver function. Secondary outcomes were the maternal and fetal outcomes in patients with ICP.Data were extracted from included RCTs. The Mantel-Haenzel random-effects model or fixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis.

resultsA total of 12 RCTs involving 662 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In pooled analyses that compared UDCA with all controls, UDCA was associated with resolution of pruritus (risk ratio [RR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.12-2.52; P = 0.01),decrease of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.36; 95% CI, -2.08 to -0.63; P <0.001), reduced serum levels of bile acid (SMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.20; P <0.001), fewer premature births (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.72; P <0.001),reduced fetal distress (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.94; P = 0.02), high Apgar scores at 5 minutes (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82; P = 0.009), less frequent respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86; P = 0.02), and fewer neonates in the intensive care unit (NICU) (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.87; P <0.05), increased gestational age (SMD,0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63; P <0.001), and birth weight (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.02-0.40; P = 0.03). There were no differences in meconium staining and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) between the groups (P >0.05). No trials reported adverse effects on mothers and fetuses except nausea and emesis.

conclusionUDCA is effective and safe to improve pruritus and liver function in ICP. UDCA also reduced adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with ICP.

Indexed as

Alanine TransaminaseApgar ScoreBile Acids and SaltsCholagogues and CholereticsCholestasis, IntrahepaticFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUrsodeoxycholic AcidAlanine TransaminaseBile Acids and SaltsCholagogues and CholereticsUrsodeoxycholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID27749550
PMCPMC5059052
OpenAlexW2529739463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.