Evidence mapPaperPMID 27766580Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2016

Urogenital Autonomic Dysfunction in Diabetes.

Barbara H Braffett, Hunter Wessells, Aruna V Sarma

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Urologic complications in diabetes.Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Sexual dysfunction in women with type 1 diabetes in Norway: A qualitative study of women's experiences.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2022
    Article
  7. Autonomic neuropathy and urologic complications in diabetes.Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2020
    Review
  8. Clinical spectrum and diagnosis of diabetic neuropathies.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara H BraffettThe Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, 6110 Executive Blvd, Suite 750, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA. braffett@bsc.gwu.edu.
Hunter WessellsDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356510, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Aruna V SarmaDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Bldg 16, 109E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
George Washington University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review details the epidemiology, possible mechanisms, and risk factors associated with urogenital autonomic dysfunction in diabetes. Autonomic neuropathy in diabetes is associated with various urological complications including bladder and sexual dysfunction. Several studies have reported the high prevalence of bladder and sexual dysfunction in both men and women. The DCCT/EDIC UroEDIC study examined the association between cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and bladder and sexual dysfunction in a large cohort of participants with type 1 diabetes and was the first to report significant associations. Future studies are needed to further evaluate the association of urogenital complications and autonomic dysfunction in diabetes.

Indexed as

Autonomic Nervous System DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMaleSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalUrinary Bladder DiseasesAutonomic neuropathyBladder dysfunctionDiabetesErectile dysfunctionSexual dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID27766580
OpenAlexW2535184763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.