Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27770567›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

A computational interactome and functional annotation for the human proteome.

José Ignacio Garzón, Lei Deng, Diana Murray, Sagi Shapira, Donald Petrey, Barry Honig

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proteome-wide prediction of interactions between structured domains and peptide motifs reveals functionally coherent subnetworks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent progress and future challenges in structure-based protein-protein interaction prediction.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. ZEPPI: Proteome-scale sequence-based evaluation of protein-protein interaction models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Physicochemical classification of organisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Ignacio GarzónCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Lei DengCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Diana MurrayCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Sagi ShapiraCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Donald PetreyCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Barry HonigCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2480-6696

Funding

COMPUTER STUDIES OF PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONR01GM030518 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HONIG, BARRY H · 1985 to 2020
$4.5M
Quantitative Studies of influenza EvolutionR01GM109018 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHAPIRA, SAGI · 2014 to 2019
$2.6M
High-performance compute cluster for biomedical computingS10OD012351 · OD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2012 to 2012
$2.0M
COMPUTER STUDIES OF PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONR37GM030518 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HONIG, BARRY H · 1995 to 2004
$1.5M
Storage System for High Performance ComputingS10OD021764 · OD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2016 to 2016
$600k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030518NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109018NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM030518NIH HHS S10 OD012351NIH HHS S10 OD021764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a database, PrePPI (Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions), of more than 1.35 million predicted protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Of these at least 127,000 are expected to constitute direct physical interactions although the actual number may be much larger (~500,000). The current PrePPI, which contains predicted interactions for about 85% of the human proteome, is related to an earlier version but is based on additional sources of interaction evidence and is far larger in scope. The use of structural relationships allows PrePPI to infer numerous previously unreported interactions. PrePPI has been subjected to a series of validation tests including reproducing known interactions, recapitulating multi-protein complexes, analysis of disease associated SNPs, and identifying functional relationships between interacting proteins. We show, using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), that predicted interaction partners can be used to annotate a protein's function. We provide annotations for most human proteins, including many annotated as having unknown function.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinMolecular Sequence AnnotationProtein Interaction MapsProteomeComputational BiologyHumansProteomecomputational biologyfunction annotationhumanmachine learningprotein interactionssystems biology

Identifiers

PMID27770567
PMCPMC5115866

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.