Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27815593›Full record

ReviewHNO2017

[Treating nasal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea patients].

T Verse, S Wenzel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T VerseKlinik für Atemwegs-, Lungen- und Thoraxmedizin, Abteilung für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 52, 21075, Hamburg, Deutschland. t.verse@asklepios.com.
S WenzelKlinik für Atemwegs-, Lungen- und Thoraxmedizin, Abteilung für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 52, 21075, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of treating nasal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients is still intensively discussed at congresses. This is likely due to the highly conflicting results of nasal treatments in regard to restorative sleep on the one hand, and their influence on the severity of OSA on the other. Both conservative and surgical nasal treatments result in a highly significant improvement of sleep quality. Patients' sleep is more restorative, which has a huge impact on several quality of life parameters. In contrast, the impact of conservative and surgical nasal treatments on the severity of OSA measured using the apnea-hypopnea index is very limited, apart from rare exceptions. However, there are preliminary data indicating that successful nasal surgery may facilitate or enable nasal ventilation therapy by lowering the effective pressure.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNasal ObstructionNasal Surgical ProceduresSleep Apnea, ObstructiveTreatment OutcomeNasal surgeryNoseQuality of lifeSleep apnea syndromSleep-disordered breathing

Identifiers

PMID27815593

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.