Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2016
Effects of Combined General/Epidural Anesthesia on Hemodynamics, Respiratory Function, and Stress Hormone Levels in Patients with Ovarian Neoplasm Undergoing Laparoscopy.
Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemodynamics and anesthetic effect of propofol combined with remifentanil in patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy under laryngeal mask airway anesthesia.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- General anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia on the postoperative cognitive functions in pregnant women with dystocia.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
- Geriatric Anesthesia-related Morbidity and Mortality in China: Current Status and Trend.Chinese medical journal · 2017Review
- Effect of different anesthetic methods on cellular immune functioning and the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer undergoing oophorectomy.Bioscience reports · 2017Article
- Outcomes of Laparoscopic Treatment in Women with Cesarean Scar Syndrome.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of combined general/epidural anesthesia (GEA) on hemodynamics, respiratory function and stress hormone levels in patients with ovarian neoplasm undergoing laparoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 177 patients with ovarian neoplasm (screened by inclusion/exclusion criteria) receiving laparoscopy were divided into groups G (general anesthesia alone), L1.0 (GEA with 1.0% lidocaine), and L1.5 (GEA with 1.5% lidocaine). Hemodynamics, respiratory parameters and stress hormone levels in the 3 groups were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS Hemodynamic indexes and PaO2/PaCO2 in group L1.0 showed no differences at each time point (all P>0.05). At the end of anesthesia tracheal intubation (T1), 10 min after pneumoperitoneum (T2) and the end of anesthesia tracheal extubation (T3), there were significant differences in hemodynamic indexes, respiratory parameters, epinephrine (E), and noradrenalin (NE) of group G/L1.5, compared with before anesthesia induction (T0) (all P<0.05). Compared with group G, there were big differences in dosage of anesthetics (sufentanil, vecuronium, and propofol) and pharmaceutic adjuvants (ephedrine, atropine, and nitroglycerin), postoperative recovery time, extubation time, and incidence of agitation in group L1.0/L1.5 (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS GEA can improve the quality and efficiency in laparoscopy for ovarian neoplasm, with the advantages of reduced anesthetics dosage, satisfactory postoperative analgesia, maintained hemodynamic stability, excellent uterine relaxation, and reduced time of anesthesia induction, surgery, recovery, and extubation. In addition, compared with group L1.5, group L1.0 was more secure and worthy of clinical promotion in laparoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.