Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27837429›Full record

ArticleDemography2016

Quantifying Intrinsic and Extrinsic Contributions to Human Longevity: Application of a Two-Process Vitality Model to the Human Mortality Database.

David J Sharrow, James J Anderson

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David J SharrowUniversity of Washington, Box 358218, Seattle, WA, 98195-8218, USA. dsharrow@uw.edu.
James J AndersonUniversity of Washington, Box 358218, Seattle, WA, 98195-8218, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Vitality Theory for BiodemographyR21AG046760 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ANDERSON, JAMES JAY · 2014 to 2015
$330k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG046760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise in human life expectancy has involved declines in intrinsic and extrinsic mortality processes associated, respectively, with senescence and environmental challenges. To better understand the factors driving this rise, we apply a two-process vitality model to data from the Human Mortality Database. Model parameters yield intrinsic and extrinsic cumulative survival curves from which we derive intrinsic and extrinsic expected life spans (ELS). Intrinsic ELS, a measure of longevity acted on by intrinsic, physiological factors, changed slowly over two centuries and then entered a second phase of increasing longevity ostensibly brought on by improvements in old-age death reduction technologies and cumulative health behaviors throughout life. The model partitions the majority of the increase in life expectancy before 1950 to increasing extrinsic ELS driven by reductions in environmental, event-based health challenges in both childhood and adulthood. In the post-1950 era, the extrinsic ELS of females appears to be converging to the intrinsic ELS, whereas the extrinsic ELS of males is approximately 20 years lower than the intrinsic ELS.

Indexed as

LongevityModels, TheoreticalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGlobal HealthHealth BehaviorHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansEpidemiologic transitionLife expectancyMortalitySurvivalVitality

Identifiers

PMID27837429
PMCPMC5131871
OpenAlexW4253654015

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.