Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27892991›Full record

ReviewJAMA oncology2017

Surveillance Mammography in Older Patients With Breast Cancer-Can We Ever Stop?: A Review.

Rachel A Freedman, Nancy L Keating, Ann H Partridge, Hyman B Muss, Arti Hurria, Eric P Winer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Diagnostic yield of surveillance mammography among older women.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Use of Surveillance Mammography Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors by Life Expectancy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel A FreedmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nancy L KeatingDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ann H PartridgeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hyman B MussDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Arti HurriaDepartment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Eric P WinerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USHarvard University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Behavioral Economics and Improving Chemotherapy Decisions for Advanced CancerK24CA181510 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KEATING, NANCY L · 2014 to 2018
$867k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA181510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceApproximately 4% to 5% of breast cancer survivors will develop a new ipsilateral or contralateral cancer (in-breast event) over the 5 years following diagnosis, and annual surveillance mammography is recommended for those with residual breast tissue. The risk for such in-breast events persists over time, though increasing age at cancer diagnosis and treatment with hormonal therapy are associated with lower risk, and most older survivors of breast cancer will ultimately die from nonbreast cancer-related causes. Specific guidelines for surveillance strategies in older patients are limited. Prospective data on the benefits and harms of surveillance mammography in this population are lacking, and most of the evidence is derived from observational, retrospective data, often in the general population. OBSERVATIONS: We review the current recommendations for breast cancer screening and surveillance for older patients, the current evidence for ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risks in older survivors of breast cancer, and suggested approaches for discussions about surveillance mammography with older patients. We recommend individualized decision making for surveillance breast imaging in older survivors of breast cancer, with consideration of the following strategy for women 70 years or older: 1-time imaging 6 to 12 months after completion of local therapy followed by annual or biennial surveillance mammography for healthy women and cessation of mammography in patients whose life expectancy is less than 5 years to 10 years, regardless of age. Decisions on mammographic surveillance should also incorporate whether hormonal therapy is being administered, whether a patient's anticipated life expectancy is extraordinary, and whether a patient's individual risk for in-breast events is higher (or lower) than average risk for breast cancer survivors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We propose reframing discussions around surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors and to consider cessation while taking into account life expectancy, the estimated risk for subsequent in-breast events, and patient preferences.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyMammographyMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePractice Guidelines as TopicPrecision MedicineSurvivorsAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID27892991
PMCPMC5540165
OpenAlexW2553676395

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.