Evidence mapPaperPMID 27893049Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2017

A Novel Approach to Assess the In Situ Versus Ex Vivo Mechanical Behaviors of the Coronary Artery.

Ruoya Wang, Julia Raykin, Luke P Brewster, Rudolph L Gleason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruoya WangGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Julia RaykinWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Luke P BrewsterParker H. Petit Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Woodruff Memorial Research Building, 101 Woodruff Circle, Suite 5105, Atlanta, GA 30332;Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30307; Surgical and Research Services, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, GA 30033 e-mail: lbrewst@emory.edu.
Rudolph L GleasonGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;Parker H. Petit Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Drive, IBB 2305, Atlanta, GA 30332 e-mail: rudy.gleason@me.gatech.edu.

Funding

Biology, Biomechanics and AtherosclerosisR01HL070531 · EMORY UNIVERSITY · 2002 to 2005
$5.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL119592NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL070531NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL088156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ex vivo mechanical testing has provided tremendous insight toward prediction of the in vivo mechanical behavior and local mechanical environment of the arterial wall; however, the role of perivascular support on the local mechanical behavior of arteries is not well understood. Here, we present a novel approach for quantifying the impact of the perivascular support on arterial mechanics using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) on cadaveric porcine hearts. We performed pressure-diameter tests (n = 5) on the left anterior descending coronary arteries (LADCAs) in situ while embedded in their native perivascular environment using IVUS imaging and after removal of the perivascular support of the artery. We then performed standard cylindrical biaxial testing on these vessels ex vivo and compared the results. Removal of the perivascular support resulted in an upward shift of the pressure-diameter curve. Ex vivo testing, however, showed significantly lower circumferential compliance compared to the in situ configuration. On a second set of arteries, local axial stretch ratios were quantified (n = 5) along the length of the arteries. The average in situ axial stretch ratio was 1.28 ± 0.16; however, local axial stretch ratios showed significant variability, ranging from 1.01 to 1.70. Taken together, the data suggest that both the perivascular loading and the axial tethering have an important role in arterial mechanics. Combining nondestructive testing using IVUS with traditional ex vivo cylindrical biaxial testing yields a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanical behavior of arteries.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAnimalsBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureComputer SimulationCoronary VesselsElastic ModulusImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaterials TestingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySwineTensile StrengthUltrasonography, InterventionalVascular Resistance

Identifiers

PMID27893049
PMCPMC5188853

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.