Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27898685›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

High-Resolution Phenotypic Landscape of the RNA Polymerase II Trigger Loop.

Chenxi Qiu, Olivia C Erinne, Jui M Dave, Ping Cui, Huiyan Jin, Nandhini Muthukrishnan, Leung K Tang, Sabareesh Ganesh Babu, Kenny C Lam, Paul J Vandeventer and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. RNA polymerase inhibitors reveal active-site motions essential for the nucleotide addition cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Higher-order epistasis within Pol II trigger loop haplotypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II substrate binding and metal coordination using a free-electron laser.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mutation bias and the predictability of evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chenxi QiuDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0314-5307
Olivia C ErinneMississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi.
Jui M DaveDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Ping CuiDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Huiyan JinDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Nandhini MuthukrishnanDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Leung K TangDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Sabareesh Ganesh BabuDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5551-6683
Kenny C LamDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Paul J VandeventerDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9795-7647
Ralf StrohnerMorphoSys AG, Planegg, Germany.
Jan Van den BrulleMorphoSys AG, Planegg, Germany.
Sing-Hoi SzeDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Craig D KaplanDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.

Funding

RNA POLYMERASE II TRANSCRIPTION SYSTEM FROM YEASTR01GM036659 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KORNBERG, ROGER D · 1986 to 2016
$4.7M
Mechanism and Regulation of RNA Polymerase II ElongationR01GM097260 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAPLAN, CRAIG · 2011 to 2020
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036659NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The active sites of multisubunit RNA polymerases have a "trigger loop" (TL) that multitasks in substrate selection, catalysis, and translocation. To dissect the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II TL at individual-residue resolution, we quantitatively phenotyped nearly all TL single variants en masse. Three mutant classes, revealed by phenotypes linked to transcription defects or various stresses, have distinct distributions among TL residues. We find that mutations disrupting an intra-TL hydrophobic pocket, proposed to provide a mechanism for substrate-triggered TL folding through destabilization of a catalytically inactive TL state, confer phenotypes consistent with pocket disruption and increased catalysis. Furthermore, allele-specific genetic interactions among TL and TL-proximal domain residues support the contribution of the funnel and bridge helices (BH) to TL dynamics. Our structural genetics approach incorporates structural and phenotypic data for high-resolution dissection of transcription mechanisms and their evolution, and is readily applicable to other essential yeast proteins.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAllelesCatalysisCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayMutant ProteinsMutationProtein FoldingProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein TransportRNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiaeSubstrate SpecificityMutant ProteinsRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID27898685
PMCPMC5127505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.