Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27910972›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2016

A liver microphysiological system of tumor cell dormancy and inflammatory responsiveness is affected by scaffold properties.

A M Clark, S E Wheeler, C L Young, L Stockdale, J Shepard Neiman, W Zhao, D B Stolz, R Venkataramanan, D Lauffenburger, L Griffith and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tumor Metastasis in the Microcirculation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Cancer metastasisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Modeling Tumor Cell Dormancy in an Ex Vivo Liver Metastatic Niche.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Engineering Modular 3D Liver Culture MicroenvironmentsAdvanced nanobiomed research · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

A M ClarkDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, S711 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. wellsa@upmc.edu.
S E WheelerDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, S711 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. wellsa@upmc.edu.
C L YoungDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
L StockdaleDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
J Shepard NeimanDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
W ZhaoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
D B StolzDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, S711 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. wellsa@upmc.edu and Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
R VenkataramananDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, S711 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. wellsa@upmc.edu and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
D LauffenburgerDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
L GriffithDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
A WellsDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, S711 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. wellsa@upmc.edu and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Probing the Role of the Tumor Microenvironment on Mechanistic Biomarkers for Chemotherapeutic ResistanceUH3TR000496 · NCATS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRIFFITH, LINDA G · 2014 to 2016
$3.5M
Molecular Regulation of Breast Cancer ProgressionI01BX003368 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI WELLS, ALAN · 2016 to 2023
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003368NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distant metastasis is the major cause of breast cancer-related mortality, commonly emerging clinically after 5 or more years of seeming 'cure' of the primary tumor, indicating a quiescent dormancy. The lack of relevant accessible model systems for metastasis that recreate this latent stage has hindered our understanding of the molecular basis and the development of therapies against these lethal outgrowths. We previously reported on the development of an all-human 3D ex vivo hepatic microphysiological system that reproduces several features of liver physiology and enables spontaneous dormancy in a subpopulation of breast cancer cells. However, we observed that the dormant cells were localized primarily within the 3D tissue, while the proliferative cells were in contact with the polystyrene scaffold. As matrix stiffness is known to drive inflammatory and malignant behaviors, we explored the occurrence of spontaneous tumor dormancy and inflammatory phenotype. The microphysiological system was retrofitted with PEGDa-SynKRGD hydrogel scaffolding, which is softer and differs in the interface with the tissue. The microphysiological system incorporated donor-matched primary human hepatocytes and non-parenchymal cells (NPCs), with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Hepatic tissue in hydrogel scaffolds secreted lower levels of pro-inflammatory analytes, and was more responsive to inflammatory stimuli. The proportion of tumor cells entering dormancy was markedly increased in the hydrogel-supported tissue compared to polystyrene. Interestingly, an unexpected differential response of dormant cells to varying chemotherapeutic doses was identified, which if reflective of patient pathophysiology, has important implications for patient dosing regimens. These findings highlight the metastatic microphysiological system fitted with hydrogel scaffolds as a critical tool in the assessment and development of therapeutic strategies to target dormant metastatic breast cancer.

Indexed as

alpha 1-AntitrypsinAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalChemokinesCluster AnalysisCytokinesFemaleFibrinogenHepatocytesHumansHydrogelsImmunoassayIntercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteinsalpha 1-AntitrypsinAntineoplastic AgentsChemokinesCytokinesFibrinogenHydrogelsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPolystyrenes

Identifiers

PMID27910972
PMCPMC5242229

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.