Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2016
Prognostic Importance of C-Reactive Protein in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The AGE-RAGE-DIAPH1 Axis in Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Dysfunction: From Carbonyl Stress to Diabetic Myocardial and Neuronal Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- γδ T-cell interferon-γ production reflects metabolic improvement during SGLT2 inhibitor-based therapy in type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Article
- Association of the inflammatory burden index with the risk of pre-diabetes and diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Article
- The combined effect of CRP and blood pressure on the risk of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Precision prognostics for cardiovascular disease in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Association of inflammatory score with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with metabolic syndrome: NHANES longitudinal cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular Statistics - Brazil 2021.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Article
- Old and New Biomarkers Associated with Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Hyperglycemia.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Review
- The Liability Threshold Model for Predicting the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Multi-Cohort Study of Korean Adults.Metabolites · 2020Article
- The trajectory of high sensitivity C-reactive protein is associated with incident diabetes in Chinese adults.Nutrition & metabolism · 2020Article
- Article
- Cardiovascular Risk Estimated by UKPDS Risk Engine Algorithm in Diabetes.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) is controversial in type 2 diabetes mellitus. We aimed to assess it in a cohort of high cardiovascular risk diabetic patients. METHODS AND
resultsCRP was measured at baseline and during the second year of follow-up in 616 patients. The primary end points were a composite of total fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (CVEs), major CVEs, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities. Association between baseline and second-year CRP with end points were evaluated by multivariable Cox survival analyses. Baseline median CRP was 2.8 mg/L (interquartile range: 1.2-6.0 mg/L), and 47.8% of the patients either increased or persisted with high CRP levels during the first 2 years of follow-up. After a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 131 total CVEs occurred (89 major CVEs), and 129 patients died (53 of cardiovascular causes). Baseline and second-year CRP, analyzed as a continuous variable and dichotomized at >3.0 mg/L, were significantly associated with total and major CVEs occurrence (with adjusted hazard ratios between 1.22 and 1.34 for increments of 1-SD log of continuous CRP, and between 1.47 and 1.89 for dichotomized CRP), but not with mortality. Additionally, increasing CRP levels or persisting with high levels were associated with a 1.84 (95% CI: 1.10-3.06) excess risk of major CVEs, independent of baseline CRP values.
conclusionsBaseline and serial changes in CRP levels provide cardiovascular risk prediction independent of standard risk factors and glycemic control, and may be useful to refine cardiovascular risk stratification in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.