ReviewHNO2017
[Modern modifications of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty].
Review in HNO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient-Reported Outcomes of Palatopharyngeal Surgery Without Tonsillectomy: A Meta-Analysis.The Laryngoscope · 2026Pooled it
- Palate surgery for obstructive sleep apnea: a 17-year meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Comparison of two surgical suture techniques in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018Trial
- Evaluation of a nasopharyngeal stent in patients with obstructive sleep-related breathing disorders.The Journal of international medical research · 2022Article
- Complete concentric collapse at the soft palate in sleep endoscopy: what change is possible after UPPP in patients with CPAP failure?Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2018Article
- Effectiveness of Palatopharyngeal Surgery Modifications in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-analysis.OTO openReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) was first described in 1964 with regard to surgical treatment of snoring and in 1981 with regard to treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The initial surgical techniques for OSA were very invasive, frequently leading to significant morbidity and complications. Wolfgang Pirsig et al. were the first in Germany to recognize that a radical surgical technique increased only the complications, not the efficacy of UPPP. The less invasive surgical technique developed based on these findings is still established in Germany. A meta-analysis from 1996 described a success rate of UPPP of about 50%. High-quality randomized trials demonstrate significant superiority of UPPP plus tonsillectomy compared to untreated controls. However, the objective outcome measures of classic UPPP could not be improved even with additional patient selection criteria, and the effects of UPPP often deteriorate over time. To overcome these limitations, various modifications of UPPP have been developed. Due to limited data, evaluation of these new techniques and their comparison with conventional UPPP is difficult at present. In studies comparing a modification of UPPP with the standard approach, the tested modification was demonstrated to be superior. A relevant limitation of the available data results from the small number of institutions (usually not more than two) that investigated the respective modification and the follow-up periods of usually only 6 months. Data are also too sparse to reliably assess complication rates. For conventional UPPP there are considerably more data, wider experience with long-term outcome, and more robust studies examining treatment effects beyond basic respiratory parameters. At present, modifications of UPPP should be principally employed in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27933351What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.