Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933351›Full record

ReviewHNO2017

[Modern modifications of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty].

T Verse, B A Stuck

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Palate surgery for obstructive sleep apnea: a 17-year meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Comparison of two surgical suture techniques in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T VerseKlinik für Atemwegs-, Lungen- und Thoraxmedizin, Abteilung für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 52, 21075, Hamburg, Deutschland. t.verse@asklepios.com.
B A StuckKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) was first described in 1964 with regard to surgical treatment of snoring and in 1981 with regard to treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The initial surgical techniques for OSA were very invasive, frequently leading to significant morbidity and complications. Wolfgang Pirsig et al. were the first in Germany to recognize that a radical surgical technique increased only the complications, not the efficacy of UPPP. The less invasive surgical technique developed based on these findings is still established in Germany. A meta-analysis from 1996 described a success rate of UPPP of about 50%. High-quality randomized trials demonstrate significant superiority of UPPP plus tonsillectomy compared to untreated controls. However, the objective outcome measures of classic UPPP could not be improved even with additional patient selection criteria, and the effects of UPPP often deteriorate over time. To overcome these limitations, various modifications of UPPP have been developed. Due to limited data, evaluation of these new techniques and their comparison with conventional UPPP is difficult at present. In studies comparing a modification of UPPP with the standard approach, the tested modification was demonstrated to be superior. A relevant limitation of the available data results from the small number of institutions (usually not more than two) that investigated the respective modification and the follow-up periods of usually only 6 months. Data are also too sparse to reliably assess complication rates. For conventional UPPP there are considerably more data, wider experience with long-term outcome, and more robust studies examining treatment effects beyond basic respiratory parameters. At present, modifications of UPPP should be principally employed in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresPalate, SoftPharynxPostoperative ComplicationsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSnoringTreatment OutcomeComplicationsObstructive sleep apneaOtorhinolaryngologic surgical proceduresSoft palateUvula

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.