Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933508›Full record

Observational studyWiener klinische Wochenschrift2017

Patterns of diabetes care in Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria and Romania : An observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional study.

Miro Cokolic, Nebojsa M Lalic, Dragan Micic, Gorana Mirosevic, Sanja Klobucar Majanovic, Ivaylo N Lefterov, Mariana Graur

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miro CokolicDepartment for Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Medical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska ulica 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia. miro.cokolic@ukc-mb.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9933-3598
Nebojsa M LalicClinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dragan MicicClinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Gorana MirosevicDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases "Mladen Sekso", Clinical Hospital Centre "Sisters of Mercy", Zagreb, Croatia.
Sanja Klobucar MajanovicDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, University Hospital Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Ivaylo N LefterovDiagnostic Consultative Center XII, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Mariana GraurGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidelines for treating type 2 diabetes in the Balkans generally follow European guidelines. The current study was undertaken to estimate the rate of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements and level of HbA1c control in diabetic patients treated in regular clinical practice settings in the Balkans and to evaluate if providing HbA1c measurements improves adherence to treatment guidelines.

methodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled type 2 diabetic patients treated by 79 primary care physicians and 102 specialists. The participants were provided with HbA1c measuring devices to measure HbA1c during regular office visits and a physician survey evaluated HbA1c the results feedback. Relevant clinical, demographic, drug treatment and specialist referral data were extracted from patient charts. Descriptive statistics and stepwise multivariate regression analysis were used.

resultsAmong 1853 patients included (average age 63.5 ± 10.7 years, 51% male) the average diabetes duration was 8.9 ± 7.1 years, 40% of patients had HbA1c measured every 6 months and 34% every 12 months (or less frequently). The rate of 6‑month measurement was higher among specialists (43%) vs. primary care physicians (32%, p < 0.01). The average HbA1c was 7.3 ± 1.5 and 35% of patients achieved the target HbA1c level of < 6.5%. Metformin monotherapy was prescribed to 28% of patients and metformin + sulphonylurea to 23%, 55% of patients on metformin monotherapy and 32% of patients on dual therapy metformin + sulphonylurea achieved the target HbA1c < 6.5%. Treatment remained unchanged in 91% and was stepped up in only 7.2% of patients. Physicians were not surprised (in 79% of patients) or were pleasantly surprised (in 11%) by the HbA1c results at the time of visit. Average diabetes duration and patient use of home glucometers were associated with the level of disease control.

conclusionsThe rates of HbA1c measurements remain low in the Balkans, although higher among specialists. Over 60% of patients, mostly treated with traditional oral antidiabetics did not achieve disease control. Providing convenient HbA1c measurement devices was not associated with a marked change in diabetes management. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of these treatment patterns on long-term outcomes and costs to society.

Indexed as

BulgariaCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrevalenceRomaniaSerbiaSloveniaTreatment OutcomeGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsClinical practiceDiabetes therapyGlycemic controlHbA1c measurement rateType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID27933508
PMCPMC5346140

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.