Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27974451›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Muscle afferent excitability testing in spinal root-intact rats: dissociating peripheral afferent and efferent volleys generated by intraspinal microstimulation.

Saeka Tomatsu, Geehee Kim, Joachim Confais, Kazuhiko Seki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saeka TomatsuDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Neuroscience, Tokyo, Japan; and.
Geehee KimDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Neuroscience, Tokyo, Japan; and.
Joachim ConfaisDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Neuroscience, Tokyo, Japan; and.
Kazuhiko SekiDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Neuroscience, Tokyo, Japan; and seki@ncnp.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4262-9590
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPJapan Science and Technology Agency · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presynaptic inhibition of the sensory input from the periphery to the spinal cord can be evaluated directly by intra-axonal recording of primary afferent depolarization (PAD) or indirectly by intraspinal microstimulation (excitability testing). Excitability testing is superior for use in normal behaving animals, because this methodology bypasses the technically challenging intra-axonal recording. However, use of excitability testing on the muscle or joint afferent in intact animals presents its own technical challenges. Because these afferents, in many cases, are mixed with motor axons in the peripheral nervous system, it is crucial to dissociate antidromic volleys in the primary afferents from orthodromic volleys in the motor axon, both of which are evoked by intraspinal microstimulation. We have demonstrated in rats that application of a paired stimulation protocol with a short interstimulus interval (ISI) successfully dissociated the antidromic volley in the nerve innervating the medial gastrocnemius muscle. By using a 2-ms ISI, the amplitude of the volleys evoked by the second stimulation was decreased in dorsal root-sectioned rats, but the amplitude did not change or was slightly increased in ventral root-sectioned rats. Excitability testing in rats with intact spinal roots indicated that the putative antidromic volleys exhibited dominant primary afferent depolarization, which was reasonably induced from the more dorsal side of the spinal cord. We concluded that excitability testing with a paired-pulse protocol can be used for studying presynaptic inhibition of somatosensory afferents in animals with intact spinal roots.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsElectric StimulationEvoked PotentialsMaleMuscle, SkeletalNeurons, AfferentRatsRats, WistarSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Nerve RootsTime Factorsexcitability testingintact ventral rootmuscle afferentpresynaptic inhibition

Identifiers

PMID27974451
PMCPMC5310232
OpenAlexW2565618429

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.