Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27977013›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

Acupuncture in the neonatal intensive care unit-using ancient medicine to help today's babies: a review.

K L Chen, I Quah-Smith, G M Schmölzer, R Niemtzow, J L Oei

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Acupuncture for procedural pain in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Auricular Medicine in Neonatal Care.Medical acupuncture · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K L ChenSchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
I Quah-SmithCentre for Healthy Brain Aging, CHeBA, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
G M SchmölzerCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
R NiemtzowUnited States Air Force Acupuncture and Integrative Medicine Center, Joint Base Andrews, MD, USA.
J L OeiSchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acupuncture has been used for thousands of years in Eastern medicine for a variety of conditions and illnesses, including pain. Neonatal intensive care, on the other hand, is a relatively new branch of medicine that has emerged as the pivotal influence in increasing survival of critically ill newborn infants only within the last 50 years. Unfortunately, pain is an inevitable part of treatment in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The control and prevention of pain remains a major issue for clinicians despite recognition and understanding of the myriad of short- and long-term problems that are associated with both pain and its treatment within the NICU environment. In this review, we examine the potential role of acupuncture to decrease and treat pain in babies requiring neonatal intensive care and discuss future therapeutic and research implications for the use of this ancient therapy within the modern environment of the NICU.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPain ManagementRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID27977013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.