Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27995131›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2016

Total particulate matter concentration skews cigarette smoke's gene expression profile.

Anna Dvorkin-Gheva, Gilles Vanderstocken, Ali Önder Yildirim, Corry-Anke Brandsma, Ma'en Obeidat, Yohan Bossé, John A Hassell, Martin R Stampfli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna Dvorkin-GhevaDept of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Centre for Functional Genomics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; These authors contributed equally.
Gilles VanderstockenDept of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; These authors contributed equally.
Ali Önder YildirimInstitute of Lung Biology and Disease (iLBD), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL).
Corry-Anke BrandsmaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC research institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ma'en ObeidatThe University of British Columbia Center for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Yohan BosséCentre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Quebec City, QC, Canada; Dept of Molecular Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
John A HassellCentre for Functional Genomics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Martin R StampfliDept of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Dept of Medicine, Firestone Institute of Respiratory Health at St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
McMaster University · CAMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAHelmholtz Zentrum München · DESt. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure of small animals to cigarette smoke is widely used as a model to study the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, protocols and exposure systems utilised vary substantially and it is unclear how these different systems compare. We analysed the gene expression profile of six publically available murine datasets from different cigarette smoke-exposure systems and related the gene signatures to three clinical cohorts. 234 genes significantly regulated by cigarette smoke in at least one model were used to construct a 55-gene network containing 17 clusters. Increasing numbers of differentially regulated clusters were associated with higher total particulate matter concentrations in the different datasets. Low total particulate matter-induced genes mainly related to xenobiotic/detoxification responses, while higher total particulate matter activated immune/inflammatory processes in addition to xenobiotic/detoxification responses. To translate these observations to the clinic, we analysed the regulation of the revealed network in three human cohorts. Similar to mice, we observed marked differences in the number of regulated clusters between the cohorts. These differences were not determined by pack-year. Although none of the experimental models exhibited a complete alignment with any of the human cohorts, some exposure systems showed higher resemblance. Thus, depending on the cohort, clinically observed changes in gene expression may be mirrored more closely by specific cigarette smoke exposure systems. This study emphasises the need for careful validation of animal models.

Identifiers

PMID27995131
PMCPMC5165723
OpenAlexW2554310998

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.