Evidence mapPaperPMID 28003299Full record

ReviewBMJ open2016

Clinical impact of lifestyle interventions for the prevention of diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews.

Lara Howells, Besma Musaddaq, Ailsa J McKay, Azeem Majeed

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Epidemiological features and prevalence patterns of prediabetes outcomes in an east coast Malaysian cohort: A retrospective cohort study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Supplementary Effects ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lara HowellsDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Besma MusaddaqRoyal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Ailsa J McKayDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-9858
Imperial College London · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the clinical outcomes of combined diet and physical activity interventions for populations at high risk of type 2 diabetes.

designOverview of systematic reviews (search dates April-December 2015).

settingAny level of care; no geographical restriction.

participantsAdults at high risk of diabetes (as per measures of glycaemia, risk assessment or presence of risk factors).

interventionsCombined diet and physical activity interventions including ≥2 interactions with a healthcare professional, and ≥12 months follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: glycaemia, diabetes incidence. Secondary: behaviour change, measures of adiposity, vascular disease and mortality.

results19 recent reviews were identified for inclusion; 5 with AMSTAR scores <8. Most considered only randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and RCTs were the major data source in the remainder. Five trials were included in most reviews. Almost all analyses reported that interventions were associated with net reductions in diabetes incidence, measures of glycaemia and adiposity, at follow-up durations of up to 23 years (typically <6). Small effect sizes and potentially transient effect were reported in some studies, and some reviewers noted that durability of intervention impact was potentially sensitive to duration of intervention and adherence to behaviour change. Behaviour change, vascular disease and mortality outcome data were infrequently reported, and evidence of the impact of intervention on these outcomes was minimal. Evidence for age effect was mixed, and sex and ethnicity effect were little considered.

conclusionsRelatively long-duration lifestyle interventions can limit or delay progression to diabetes under trial conditions. However, outcomes from more time-limited interventions, and those applied in routine clinical settings, appear more variable, in keeping with the findings of recent pragmatic trials. There is little evidence of intervention impact on vascular outcomes or mortality end points in any context. 'Real-world' implementation of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention may be expected to lead to modest outcomes.

Indexed as

DietExerciseLife StylePreventive Health ServicesAdipose TissueBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansBlood GlucoseDiabetes prevention programmeDietIntermediate hyperglycaemiaPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID28003299
PMCPMC5223710
OpenAlexW2562747146

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.